On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 12:08, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> | Scott James Remnant wrote:
> | We're done!
>
> Jeez, I didn't even get the chance to start looking!
>
> Thank you both so much, I'll buy both multiple beers should we ever meet.
>
If the Libtool Team were to ever me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
| Scott James Remnant wrote:
| We're done!
Jeez, I didn't even get the chance to start looking!
Thank you both so much, I'll buy both multiple beers should we ever meet.
Peter
- --
Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com
-BEGI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott James Remnant wrote:
| By using my own subversion mirror which spanned the compromise, I've
| been able to make this slightly easier for myself when it came to the
| moved files. Still bloody tedious work, and I think I've gone
| cross-eyed now.
On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 17:23, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Argh. I am beginning to resent the amount of admin I am doing in what would
> otherwise be my hacking time :-(
>
> It's difficult, tedious and error prone.
>
By using my own subversion mirror which spanned the compromise, I've
been able to m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
| If the date that savannah was compromised is well known, then it seems
| that examining CVS diffs since that date is the best approach.
| Unfortunately, it is very easy to compromise shell code in ways which
| are not obvious.
