Bringing the discussion back to the list.
Begin forwarded message:
Hi Paolo,
I think I start to understand it now. When I was writing my e-mail,
the libtool mail archive site was also not reachable, but today it
was working again, so I have been able to do some catching up.
As you already stat
Hi Paulo,
It seems this thread starts to go into a direction that might change
the recently added functionality of the -static and -shared flags. In a
previous posting you opted for reverting the -static/-shared
functionality and in the posting quoted below you are opting to make
the disable-s
Why make enable_shared and enable_static specific to a tag? Wouldn't
it be odd that you create shared libs for "C" programs and static for
"C++"? And, the --enable-shared and --enable-static options would have
to multiply (--enable-c-shared, --enable-cxx-shared, etc).
I'm using tags for something d
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 10:44:52AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > Does this help?
> > > AC_LIBTOOL_TAGS([])
> >
> > That's only in CVS (actually, I checked and it is not in 1.5, so it must be
> > in CVS).
>
> I can send you a patch against 1.5 if you wa
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 10:44:52AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Does this help?
> > AC_LIBTOOL_TAGS([])
>
> That's only in CVS (actually, I checked and it is not in 1.5, so it must be
> in CVS).
I can send you a patch against 1.5 if you want.
> I don't see it that bad that C is not a proper t
> Does this help?
> AC_LIBTOOL_TAGS([])
That's only in CVS (actually, I checked and it is not in 1.5, so it must be
in CVS).
I don't see it that bad that C is not a proper tag, actually.
It would also be good if enable_shared and enable_static became proper tag
variables instead of globals. BTW
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 20:49, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:59:44PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > I have just upgraded to libtool 1.5 (Debian's package which is taken
> > out of CVS) and here are my first experiences.
>
> HEAD or branch-1-5? I think development is happening on
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:59:44PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> I have just upgraded to libtool 1.5 (Debian's package which is taken
> out of CVS) and here are my first experiences.
HEAD or branch-1-5? I think development is happening on HEAD towards a
1.6 release.
> However, I have had serious
I have just upgraded to libtool 1.5 (Debian's package which is taken out of
CVS) and here are my first experiences.
I'd like to make a custom tag so that, for a particular libtool library, PIC
code is also compiled with -fomit-frame-pointer (I really need the register
that is lost by the GOT code)
