Re: libtool mingw cross compile problems

2011-05-18 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Wed, May 18, 2011 at 09:13:32PM CEST: > * Erik de Castro Lopo wrote on Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:21:35PM CEST: > > The problem is the generation of a test program in a sub-directory. > > The test program that should be generated is: > > > > G72x/g72x_test.$(EXEEXT) > >

Re: libtool mingw cross compile problems

2011-05-18 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Erik, * Erik de Castro Lopo wrote on Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:21:35PM CEST: > I have a project that uses autoconf/automake/libitool etc. The > build system worked as recently as a month ago for both native > compiles on linux and cross compiles from linux to windows. > Unfortnately, linux to

libtool mingw cross compile problems

2011-05-17 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Hi all, I have a project that uses autoconf/automake/libitool etc. The build system worked as recently as a month ago for both native compiles on linux and cross compiles from linux to windows. Unfortnately, linux to wndows cross compiles suddenly stopped working with libtool 2.4 from Debian testi

Re: Linking with libtool & mingw

2007-10-25 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 05:39:47PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: > > Info: resolving _z_errmsg by linking to __imp__z_errmsg (auto-import) > > These are completely normal if you are porting software that does not > explicitly dllimport symbols. They are not errors. I supposed so. > There is not en

Re: Linking with libtool & mingw

2007-10-25 Thread Brian Dessent
Robert Schwebel wrote: > Info: resolving _deflate_copyright by linking to __imp__deflate_copyright > (auto-import) > Info: resolving __dist_code by linking to __imp___dist_code (auto-import) > Info: resolving __length_code by linking to __imp___length_code (auto-import) > Info: resolving _z_errms

Linking with libtool & mingw

2007-10-25 Thread Robert Schwebel
Hi, We are currently trying to cross compile wireshark to mingw with the standard automake cross procedure. Quite some uggly hacks later, we are now able to compile everything, but the final linker stage goes wrong. The final linker call outputs things like this one: --8<-- Info:

Re: AW: libtool + MinGW

2006-06-12 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Brendon Costa wrote on Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 10:46:29AM CEST: > Duft Markus wrote: > > > > Do you want to get it to work with the MinGW GCC, or with the MSVC > > toolchain (i.e. cl.exe, link.exe etc...) ? This makes a big > > difference, since libltdl is really useless with the MS toolchain. > >

Re: AW: libtool + MinGW

2006-06-12 Thread Brendon Costa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Duft Markus wrote: > Hi! > > Do you want to get it to work with the MinGW GCC, or with the MSVC toolchain > (i.e. cl.exe, link.exe etc...) ? This makes a big difference, since libltdl > is really useless with the MS toolchain. > > I think we allrea

Re: libtool + MinGW

2006-06-12 Thread Brendon Costa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brian Dessent wrote: > No, your example was flawed because it did not pass -no-undefined, which > means you get static libraries unconditionally. If you fix that, then > libtool builds both shared and static versions of the library, and it > successfu

Re: libtool + MinGW

2006-06-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Markus, * Duft Markus wrote on Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:31:37AM CEST: > Hmmm.. Ok, maybe i'm wrong with this, but at least i'm successfully > working with about 600mb sources on interix with the ms toolchain with > libtool but without libltdl, and it works without any problems (static > and a

AW: libtool + MinGW

2006-06-11 Thread Duft Markus
) Regards, markus -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ralf Wildenhues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Montag, 12. Juni 2006 08:28 An: Duft Markus Cc: Brendon Costa; libtool@gnu.org Betreff: Re: libtool + MinGW * Duft Markus wrote on Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:24:00AM CEST: > > Do you want t

Re: libtool + MinGW

2006-06-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Duft Markus wrote on Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:24:00AM CEST: > > Do you want to get it to work with the MinGW GCC, or with the MSVC > toolchain (i.e. cl.exe, link.exe etc...) ? This makes a big > difference, since libltdl is really useless with the MS toolchain. This statement isn't true in gener

AW: libtool + MinGW

2006-06-11 Thread Duft Markus
Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Brendon Costa Gesendet: Freitag, 9. Juni 2006 15:58 An: libtool@gnu.org Betreff: libtool + MinGW -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, As part of my quest to get libtool and MSVC working together, i

Re: libtool + MinGW

2006-06-11 Thread Brian Dessent
Brendon Costa wrote: > Question: Does libtool 1.5.22 for MinGW support shared libraries and > using DLOpened modules without dlpreopening? Of course it supports shared libraries. > If so in the example i gave before for a shared library was created > using ar cru and not g++ -shared and was link

Re: libtool + MinGW

2006-06-11 Thread Brendon Costa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Brendon Costa wrote on Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 03:58:24PM CEST: >> As part of my quest to get libtool and MSVC working together, i thought >> i would first get libtool working with an example project on a few other >> systems fi

Re: libtool + MinGW

2006-06-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Brendon Costa wrote on Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 03:58:24PM CEST: > > As part of my quest to get libtool and MSVC working together, i thought > i would first get libtool working with an example project on a few other > systems first. Are you building upon the efforts of Peter Ekberg? Because if you

Re: libtool + MinGW

2006-06-09 Thread Brendon Costa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brian Dessent wrote: > I'm not sure why you are getting the link errors about duplicated > symbols, but your testcase in general is not doing what you think it's > doing. You'll note that there is not a DLL created anywhere, and this > is because you

Re: libtool + MinGW

2006-06-09 Thread Brian Dessent
Brendon Costa wrote: > Would someone be able to have a look at the script file and let me know > what i am doing wrong? I'm not sure why you are getting the link errors about duplicated symbols, but your testcase in general is not doing what you think it's doing. You'll note that there is not a

Libtool/MinGW wrapper weirdness

2004-05-23 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
I am currently using a development version of libtool which is about six months old. Under MinGW I am seeing behavior I do not understand when executing the program via libtool's wrapper script. The strange behavior only occurs when a modules-enabled build is involved and only if the program is e

libtool/MinGW DLLs patch - tidied up section 2

2002-09-18 Thread Max Bowsher
I am tidying and explaining my patch bit by bit. Here is the second chunk. A libtool expert needs to check Hunk 2. See my comments below Once section 1 and 2 have been pronounced OK, they can be commited, as they are just groundwork for the main chunk of the patch, and can stand alone. Max. --

libtool/MinGW DLLs patch - tidied up section 1

2002-09-17 Thread Max Bowsher
I am tidying and explaining my patch bit by bit. Here is the first chunk, including the merge of the Cygwin-local changes to libtool (not done by me). Hunks 1 & 2 should be fine. Hunk 3 is purely the addition of a comment, which you may prefer to leave out on the grounds of unnecessary bloat. Eit

Re: sys_lib_search_patch_spec/path_separator (Re: Suggested pathes to CVC libtool: Mingw improvement, .rc support)

2001-09-25 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 05:44:40PM +0200, Guido Draheim wrote: > "Gary V. Vaughan" wrote: > > > > On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 11:15:43PM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > > The chance of a Unix system having > > > directory names containing semicolons is practically nil, isn't it? > > > > Yup. It is

Re: sys_lib_search_patch_spec/path_separator (Re: Suggested pathes to CVC libtool: Mingw improvement, .rc support)

2001-09-23 Thread Guido Draheim
"Gary V. Vaughan" wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 11:15:43PM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > The chance of a Unix system having > > directory names containing semicolons is practically nil, isn't it? > > Yup. It is possible technically, but anyone who uses semicolons in > PATH has got to exp

Re: sys_lib_search_patch_spec/path_separator (Re: Suggested pathes to CVC libtool: Mingw improvement, .rc support)

2001-09-23 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 11:15:43PM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > The chance of a Unix system having > directory names containing semicolons is practically nil, isn't it? Yup. It is possible technically, but anyone who uses semicolons in PATH has got to expect trouble, no? Cheers, Gary.

Re: sys_lib_search_patch_spec/path_separator (Re: Suggested pathes to CVC libtool: Mingw improvement, .rc support)

2001-09-22 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> > b) why is it just bigcaps drive-letters? > > Ditto. Although I guess this comes from the spec file, so maybe more > care _is_ needed after all? It doesn't come from the specs file, remember that the mingw gcc can be installed freely in any location, and the specs file isn't edited when

Re: sys_lib_search_patch_spec/path_separator (Re: Suggested pathes to CVC libtool: Mingw improvement, .rc support)

2001-09-22 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 05:06:54PM +0200, Guido Draheim wrote: > Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > > > -- Small improvement for mingw-hosted tool support (while still > > running libtool on cygwin). In that case PATH_SEPARATOR is ':', but > > gcc -print-search-dirs still prints its search path with ';' as

sys_lib_search_patch_spec/path_separator (Re: Suggested pathes to CVC libtool: Mingw improvement, .rc support)

2001-09-15 Thread Guido Draheim
Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > -- Small improvement for mingw-hosted tool support (while still > running libtool on cygwin). In that case PATH_SEPARATOR is ':', but > gcc -print-search-dirs still prints its search path with ';' as > separator. > >yes,mingw*) > library_names_spec='${libname}`e

Suggested pathes to CVC libtool: Mingw improvement, .rc support

2001-09-14 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Hi, Here is a patch to libtool with: -- Small improvement for mingw-hosted tool support (while still running libtool on cygwin). In that case PATH_SEPARATOR is ':', but gcc -print-search-dirs still prints its search path with ';' as separator. -- Add support for .rc files (Windows resource fil