Re: fork costs...

2006-10-22 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Kyle Sallee wrote on Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 08:31:05PM CEST: > On 10/21/06, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > I understand that you are strongly against using forks > >> > where the equivilent can be coded without it. > > > >Not so. Forking in order to invoke faster tools or to

Re: fork costs...

2006-10-21 Thread Kyle Sallee
Comments made inline... On 10/21/06, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well. In fact I have a working patch on my disk to separate link mode in another scriptlet libtool-link. It speeds up script execution on my GNU/Linux by about 20%. I can post it if people desire, but I'm agains

Re: fork costs...

2006-10-21 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Eric Blake wrote on Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 02:37:59PM CEST: > According to Kyle Sallee on 10/21/2006 1:43 AM: > > I was looking at > > /libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh > > one of the first uses of tem_deplibs has a nearby call to > > func_stripname '-R' '' "$libdir" > > That uses a separate invocation o

Re: fork costs...

2006-10-21 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please keep replies on the list. According to Kyle Sallee on 10/21/2006 1:43 AM: > I was looking at > /libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh > one of the first uses of tem_deplibs has a nearby call to > func_stripname '-R' '' "$libdir" > That uses a separate inv