On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Daniel Herring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Dan Nicholson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Do you know if there's any way for automake to ignore the "include"
> > keyword? I.e., I really want the "include" to be processed by make,
> > not automa
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Dan Nicholson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you know if there's any way for automake to ignore the "include"
keyword? I.e., I really want the "include" to be processed by make,
not automake. The only ugly way I could think of was to include a
dummy file that had the real inclu
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I am pretty sure that you can similarly avoid the need fo
ever, I may just
> have to add a macro anyway since we need pic when building mesa
> independently of Xorg. I may end up just borrowing some parts of
> libtool.m4 and refactoring them. Or just using AC_PROG_LIBTOOL and
> stripping out the values I need like above. What I have right now
of Xorg. I may end up just borrowing some parts of
libtool.m4 and refactoring them. Or just using AC_PROG_LIBTOOL and
stripping out the values I need like above. What I have right now is
essentially "if gcc, add -fPIC, else fill in later...".
> I am pretty sure that you can similarly avo
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Peter O'Gorman - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am pretty sure that you can similarly avoid the need for a fake
convenience .la, but can not work it out without actually attempting a
build :)
On a related note, I'm working with a non-libtool library (we'll c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Peter O'Gorman - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I am pretty sure that you can similarly avoid the need for a fake
>> convenience .la, but can not work it out without actually attempting a
>> build :)
>
> On a related note
hat you can similarly avoid the need for a fake
convenience .la, but can not work it out without actually attempting a
build :)
Peter
--
Peter O'Gorman
http://pogma.com
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please make sure that this fake .la file is only used in the build tree
> where it is needed (only when building xserver? Why not commit these
> bits to xserver then?). I would not like to see s
ability of linking the static
> archive into another convenience library in the second project. My
> workaround was to create a fake .la file for the static library
> indicating that it's a convenience library. I just altered the names
> from a .la file that libtool had
to another convenience library in the second project. My
workaround was to create a fake .la file for the static library
indicating that it's a convenience library. I just altered the names
from a .la file that libtool had generated. Here's the commit:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~dbn/mesa
Hi,
Thank you for expressing interest in ATGWS watches.
We would like to take this opportunity to offer you our fine selection of
Italian crafted Rolex Timepieces.
You can view our large selection of Rolexes (including Breitling, Tag Heuer,
Cartier etc) at:
TheBettermail.com
For all orders pl
-- Virus Warning Message (on the network)
Found virus WORM_NETSKY.B in file swimmingpool.com
The file swimmingpool.com is moved to /var/spool/quarantine/virHNAlZCAra.
This is a machine-generated message, please do not reply via email. If you have
questions, please contact the Lu
13 matches
Mail list logo
