Re: don't let libtool infer the tag

2008-04-14 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 14 April 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Mike Frysinger wrote on Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 01:41:32AM CEST: > > On Sunday 13 April 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > So don't do this, please. Supply --tag=CC if your compiler name > > > doesn't match. > > > > i doubt people will care at this

Re: don't let libtool infer the tag

2008-04-14 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Mike Frysinger wrote on Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 01:41:32AM CEST: > On Sunday 13 April 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > So don't do this, please. Supply --tag=CC if your compiler name doesn't > > match. > > i doubt people will care at this point, but ive done a bit of work in Gentoo > to make the

Re: don't let libtool infer the tag (was: sysroot support in libtool)

2008-04-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 13 April 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:26:11PM CEST: > > * Richard Purdie wrote on Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 08:53:10PM CEST: > > > tag.patch - The tag errors were breaking things for no good reason so > > > we turned the error into a warning

don't let libtool infer the tag (was: sysroot support in libtool)

2008-04-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:26:11PM CEST: > * Richard Purdie wrote on Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 08:53:10PM CEST: > > > > tag.patch - The tag errors were breaking things for no good reason so we > > turned the error into a warning > > Well, don't come crying for bad performance to