On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 09:41:45AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > I have no idea what the intention of this test really is that
> > isn't covered by the other test, so I don't have a suggestion on
> > how to fix it.
>
> Did this help?
Yes it did.
> BTW, will you be maintaining the Debian Libt
Hi Kurt,
Sorry for the late reply. I overlooked your mail the first time.
(Feel free to send reminders if answers take time.)
* Kurt Roeckx wrote on Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 02:06:22PM CEST:
>
> I'm having a few problem with the deplibs.test. It's broken for
> several reasons:
> - It's linking a
Hi,
I'm having a few problem with the deplibs.test. It's broken for
several reasons:
- It's linking a shared lib against a static lib. This is not
portable, and we even give a warning about this.
- The shared lib is not using any symbols from the static lib.
- The test program is linked again
