Sorry for the self-followup.
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 09:02:03AM CEST:
> * Tim Rice wrote:
> >
> > CVS HEAD
> >
> > Is there any reason not to have ltmain.in in the source tree
> > at configure time and generate ltmain.sh (from ltmain.in) in
> > the build tree?
>
> Please
Hi Tim,
* Tim Rice wrote:
>
> CVS HEAD
>
> Is there any reason not to have ltmain.in in the source tree
> at configure time and generate ltmain.sh (from ltmain.in) in
> the build tree?
Please try the patch from
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2005-08/msg00039.html
> I'd like to b
CVS HEAD
Is there any reason not to have ltmain.in in the source tree
at configure time and generate ltmain.sh (from ltmain.in) in
the build tree?
I have UnixWare, OpenServer, Solaris and Linux (each with multiple
versions) here. I prefer to build from a NFS read-only source tree so
I can test w
