Re: Windows compilers

2009-05-14 Thread Christopher Hulbert
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello Christopher, > > * Christopher Hulbert wrote on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 01:14:47PM CEST: >> 1. What's the future of that branch? Is it ever likely to merge into >> master to become part of a libtool release and have a larger support >> b

Re: Windows compilers

2009-05-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Christopher, * Christopher Hulbert wrote on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 01:14:47PM CEST: > 1. What's the future of that branch? Is it ever likely to merge into > master to become part of a libtool release and have a larger support > base? Bob addressed this already. > 2. Based on (1), should I us

Re: Windows compilers

2009-05-13 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Christopher Hulbert wrote: Until now, I have been using for the most part the PGI compilers on Windows which conveniently use most of the same flags/command style as its Linux compilers (e.g. -L -l). I am now also trying to use the Intel compilers which use the MSVC format o

Windows compilers

2009-05-13 Thread Christopher Hulbert
Until now, I have been using for the most part the PGI compilers on Windows which conveniently use most of the same flags/command style as its Linux compilers (e.g. -L -l). I am now also trying to use the Intel compilers which use the MSVC format on Windows (e.g. -link -libpath:). I have been looki