Re: [automake patch] Re: While I'm at it....

2000-09-08 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 04:18:48AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Sep 7, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Should I commit the following to libtool as an ugly fix? > > > $ echo "This file is intentionally blank" > ltconfig > > $ cvs add ltconfig > > $ clco

Re: While I'm at it....

2000-09-08 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Sep 7, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 09:51:50AM -0700, Bruce Korb wrote: >> >> All the "error while copying" messages are innocuous because >> the copy is actually successful. It seems weird that the >> "cp" should return non-zero status to the

Re: [automake patch] Re: While I'm at it....

2000-09-08 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Sep 7, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Should I commit the following to libtool as an ugly fix? > $ echo "This file is intentionally blank" > ltconfig > $ cvs add ltconfig > $ clcommit Maybe something like: #! /bin/sh echo "ltconfig is obsolete in this

Re: While I'm at it....

2000-09-07 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 09:51:50AM -0700, Bruce Korb wrote: > > All the "error while copying" messages are innocuous because > the copy is actually successful. It seems weird that the > "cp" should return non-zero status to the automake Perl script. Cygwin does that for me too. Linux behaves p

[automake patch] Re: While I'm at it....

2000-09-07 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 09:51:50AM -0700, Bruce Korb wrote: > > Anyway, the last message bothers me: > > $ ./bootstrap > [[snip]] > configure.in: 33: required file `../ltconfig' not found Already fixed in the repository. Please update again. The problem is deepr than the cheap fix I committed