Re: Wgcc status report

2006-09-26 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Markus, I would prefer if you did not send messages to the libtool list twice, did not send messages including large patches to the libtool list (that's what the libtool-patches list is for), and I would also personally prefer if your announcement frequency were more that of an, err, announc

Wgcc status report

2006-09-26 Thread Duft Markus
Hey again! Wgcc status report ;o) (this is rc4 with libtool patch from today): PASS: cdemo-static.test PASS: cdemo-make.test PASS: cdemo-exec.test PASS: demo-static.test PASS: demo-make.test PASS: demo-exec.test PASS: demo-inst.test PASS: demo-unst.test PASS: depdemo-static.test PASS: depdemo