Olly Betts wrote:
Does the cygwin packaging chooser have the concept of dependencies?
Yes.
I've only used it briefly once some time ago, and I can't remember
much about it. But if it does, then libtool should really depend on
file.
The official libtool package for cygwin (e.g. the one you
On 2006-02-24, Charles Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Olly Betts wrote:
>> I've only used it briefly once some time ago, and I can't remember
>> much about it. But if it does, then libtool should really depend on
>> file.
>
> The official libtool package for cygwin (e.g. the one you get if yo
Olly Betts wrote:
> I don't think there's an obvious dependency cygwin could add to help
> this (unless perhaps something rather arbitrary like making 'make'
> depend on 'file'). So libtool (or rather packages it generates)
> probably does need to cope with file not being installed (or perhaps
>
Olly Betts wrote:
> Does the cygwin packaging chooser have the concept of dependencies?
> I've only used it briefly once some time ago, and I can't remember
> much about it. But if it does, then libtool should really depend on
> file.
Yes, it does, and that is a much better way of handling this.
On 2006-02-18, Brian Dessent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If libtool currently displays somewhat degraded or broken behavior
> without 'file'
Currently it's somewhat broken, but it sounds like it'll be patched at
some point and become somewhat degraded.
> then it would be a good idea to at least
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > The user who reported this to me says that cygwin doesn't come with
> > file by default either (he'd installed it very recently, so I guess
> > he probably has the latest release). I'm a little suprised by this,
> > but don't have cygwin myself so I can't check if this
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 08:12:58PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >* Olly Betts wrote on Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 08:06:52PM CET:
> >>I tried to search for previous references to this issue, but it's pretty
> >>much impossible to usefully search for "file
* Olly Betts wrote on Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 07:55:58PM CET:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 08:12:58PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > >* Olly Betts wrote on Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 08:06:52PM CET:
> > >>I tried to search for previous references to this issue
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Olly Betts wrote on Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 08:06:52PM CET:
I tried to search for previous references to this issue, but it's pretty much
impossible to usefully search for "file"! Sorry if this is rehashing old
discussions.
It's not really, but ther
Hi Olly,
* Olly Betts wrote on Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 08:06:52PM CET:
> I tried to search for previous references to this issue, but it's pretty much
> impossible to usefully search for "file"! Sorry if this is rehashing old
> discussions.
It's not really, but there is a very similar bug report an
I tried to search for previous references to this issue, but it's pretty much
impossible to usefully search for "file"! Sorry if this is rehashing old
discussions.
A user reported a problem trying to build my libtool-ed project on cygwin.
The problem turned out to be that cygwin apparently doesn'
11 matches
Mail list logo
