Hi Christian,
* Christian Biesinger wrote on Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 05:59:03PM CET:
> Hi again, and sorry for the late reply. I did, unfortunately, not have
> time to do this earlier...
That is no problem at all.
However, I guess some readers of this list might be annoyed by large
messages as you
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
By the way: does BeOS need the "lib" prefix for modules at all?
To test a hypothetical "no" answer, I think this should work:
configure
$EDITOR ./libtool # set need_lib_prefix=no
make check TESTS='tests/mdemo-shared.test'
This passed (HEAD; I interrupted the testsu
Hi Christian,
* Christian Biesinger wrote on Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 10:15:02PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >Also, we love to see testsuite output.. ;-)
>
> And here, the log of make test for HEAD. 5 tests failed... most with
> "invalid loader". Something wrong with libltdl?
Confirmed.
To re
Hi Christian,
* Christian Biesinger wrote on Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 08:51:32PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >branch-2-0 is dead, 2.0 will be released from what is now CVS HEAD.
> Ah, thank you for the checkins. The 2.0 branch status is somewhat
> unclear on the webpage, which says:
*snip*
> Th
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Also, we love to
see testsuite output.. ;-)
And here, the log of make test for HEAD. 5 tests failed... most with
"invalid loader". Something wrong with libltdl?
-biesi
checklog-head.gz
Description: PostScript document
___
h
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Maybe you could take a look at the FIXME mentioned? Also, we love to
see testsuite output.. ;-)
I attached the gzipped verbose "make check" output. Seems to me like the
problem is with accessing symbols in executables?
-biesi
checklog.gz
Description: PostScript docu
Hi Ralf,
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
branch-2-0 is dead, 2.0 will be released from what is now CVS HEAD.
I have checked in the following patches to CVS HEAD and branch-1-5,
respectively.
Ah, thank you for the checkins. The 2.0 branch status is somewhat
unclear on the webpage, which says:
HEAD
Hi Christian,
* Christian Biesinger wrote on Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 03:41:42AM CEST:
> Hi,
> the attached patch fixes (implements) C++ support for shared libraries
> on BeOS. It just copies the C part to the C++ section; this works fine,
> I tested on Zeta.
Thank you for the patch!
> The patch w
Hi,
the attached patch fixes (implements) C++ support for shared libraries
on BeOS. It just copies the C part to the C++ section; this works fine,
I tested on Zeta.
The patch was made against libtool 1.5.16; it seems to apply to 1.5.20
as well.
Would be great if you could check it in. Looki
