On Monday 16 April 2001 11:31 pm, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
> On 17 Apr 2001, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> > cc and gcc on sco know not to add -lc, so the test there looks like it
> > would probably be right, except that archive_cmds is setup to use $LD,
> > so it doesn't come into play.
> >
> > Maybe archiv
On 17 Apr 2001, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> cc and gcc on sco know not to add -lc, so the test there looks like it
> would probably be right, except that archive_cmds is setup to use $LD,
> so it doesn't come into play.
>
> Maybe archive_cmds should switch to using $CC, though I wouldn't know
> if that mi
> On Friday 13 April 2001 2:22 am, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> >
> > Without wanting to repeat myself, I posted libtool-patches in January
> > about SCO 5 and -lc on shared libraries, but the problem still exists
> > in 1.3d and the current cvs.
>
> > Something like below (re-diffed for current libtool
On Friday 13 April 2001 2:22 am, Kevin Ryde wrote:
>
> Without wanting to repeat myself, I posted libtool-patches in January
> about SCO 5 and -lc on shared libraries, but the problem still exists
> in 1.3d and the current cvs.
Yeah, sorry about that. I lost my mail archive (along with the mes
Without wanting to repeat myself, I posted libtool-patches in January
about SCO 5 and -lc on shared libraries, but the problem still exists
in 1.3d and the current cvs.
Something like below (re-diffed for current libtool.m4) will be much
wanted, since it avoids seg faults if a shared library uses
