Hi Ross, Mike,
* Mike Frysinger wrote on Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 09:25:00PM CET:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 11:53:24AM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
> >
> > It's odd that CC is used for the C++ compiler.
>
> dont confuse internal 'CC' with having any particular meaning ... cause
> it doesnt have any mean
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 11:53:24AM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 19:10 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 10:47:20AM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > > after this line in the makefile output:
> > > ./libtool --mode=link g++-3.3 -o test1 -g AbstractTimeStepsGen
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 19:10 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 10:47:20AM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > after this line in the makefile output:
> > ./libtool --mode=link g++-3.3 -o test1 -g AbstractTimeStepsGenerator.o
> > Narrowly, can anyone shed any light on the errors report
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 10:47:20AM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
> after this line in the makefile output:
> ./libtool --mode=link g++-3.3 -o test1 -g AbstractTimeStepsGenerator.o
> Narrowly, can anyone shed any light on the errors reported at the top?
the generated libtool has a different CXX tag set
I forgot to mention I'm using libtool 1.5.20-2.
At least, that's the package on my system. I think autoconf picks it up
when it runs. autoconf 2.59a-6.
I am not using automake.
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
