Hi Jeremie,
* Jeremie LE HEN wrote on Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 01:43:33PM CEST:
>
> Would you like me to redo the examples once I will be able to a install
> branch-2-0 or HEAD version ?
Naa, since you don't mind my proposed changes, I'll just apply your
patch with fixes.
> > OK. When you can get
Hi Ralf,
> > I made the changes we talked about in our previous mails. Here are a
> > few notes :
> >
> > - I wanted to install the freshly checked-out branch-2-0 from
> > CVS, in order to give real examples of the libtool output.
> > This was really a pain. I've ran into severa
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:41:46PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> They also have position-independent relocations.
> Try 'objdump -x' on my above example.
Ah yes:
.libs/foo.o:
RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.text]:
OFFSET TYPE VALUE
0019 R_386_GOTPC _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_
0
* Jeremie LE HEN wrote on Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:10:41PM CEST:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> > quartz% diff -s foo.o .libs/foo.o
> > Files foo.o and .libs/foo.o are identical
Another hint: try
---snip
int foo() { return 1; }
int bar() { return foo(); }
---snip
> I'm not a compiler guru, but as far as I can
Hi Jeremie,
* Jeremie LE HEN wrote on Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 01:45:39PM CEST:
>
> I made the changes we talked about in our previous mails. Here are a
> few notes :
>
> - I wanted to install the freshly checked-out branch-2-0 from
> CVS, in order to give real examples of the libtool
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 03:41:22PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Because in general they are _not_ identical on NetBSD. Show foo.c.
Ah - it was a very simple foo.c ;-)
quartz% cat foo.c
void foo(void);
void foo(void)
{
int i;
i=0;
}
Cheers,
Patrick
___
Hi Patrick,
> Just to check, I just tried this:
>
> quartz% uname -s
> NetBSD
> quartz% libtool compile gcc -g -O -c foo.c
> libtool: compile: gcc -g -O -c foo.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/foo.o
> libtool: compile: gcc -g -O -c foo.c -o foo.o >/dev/null 2>&1
> quartz% ls -laR
> total 16
> drwxr-xr-x
* Patrick Welche wrote on Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 03:09:29PM CEST:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 02:23:06PM +0200, Jeremie LE HEN wrote:
> > IMO, the user is confused while reading this. Furthermore, the
> > first statement is wrong in regard to the example on the NetBSD box
> > (burger) :
>
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 02:23:06PM +0200, Jeremie LE HEN wrote:
> IMO, the user is confused while reading this. Furthermore, the
> first statement is wrong in regard to the example on the NetBSD box
> (burger) :
> burger$ libtool compile gcc -g -O -c foo.c
> mkdir .libs
Hi Ralf,
> Sorry for the late response, I've been away.
Once again, sorry for the late response :-).
I made the changes we talked about in our previous mails. Here are a
few notes :
- I wanted to install the freshly checked-out branch-2-0 from
CVS, in order to give real exam
Hi Jeremie,
Sorry for the late response, I've been away.
* Jeremie LE HEN wrote on Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 02:23:06PM CEST:
>
> I began to read the documentation (from HEAD) again to make it clearer.
> Here are a few notes :
>
> * Section 3.1 ``Creating object file'' :
> << Since this is a lib
Hi Ralf,
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 05:02:46PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Jeremie LE HEN wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 03:29:55PM CEST:
> >
> > > Your documentation points are valid, thanks. We should work on that.
> >
> > You are welcome, I can update the documentation about these subjects
Hi Jeremie,
* Jeremie LE HEN wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 03:29:55PM CEST:
>
> > Your documentation points are valid, thanks. We should work on that.
>
> You are welcome, I can update the documentation about these subjects if
> someone points me out the documentation source file (maybe it's si
Hi Ralf,
> > Ok, I didn't know that too :-). I've had a look through the
> > documentation, it would be worth to give an example of the use of
> > this mode, IMHO.
>
> Your documentation points are valid, thanks. We should work on that.
You are welcome, I can update the documentation about the
[ sorry, forgot one part ]
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 05:10:22AM CEST:
> * Jeremie LE HEN wrote on Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 11:20:18AM CEST:
> >
> > I think I got my problem resolved by using the lastest version of
> > libtool (1.5.18) : with exactly the same command sequence, I
Hi Jeremie,
* Jeremie LE HEN wrote on Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 11:20:18AM CEST:
>
> Ok, I didn't know that too :-). I've had a look through the
> documentation, it would be worth to give an example of the use of
> this mode, IMHO.
Your documentation points are valid, thanks. We should work on that
Hi Ralf,
thank you for spending your time resolving my problem.
> First, a note to your Makefile:
>
> | ${LIB_A}: ${OBJS_A}
> | libtool --mode=link ${CC} -o $@ $^ -static
> |
> | # -rpath is mandatory, libtool --mode=install will fail otherwise.
> | ${LIB_SO}: ${OBJS_SO}
> |
Hi Jeremie,
* Jeremie LE HEN wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 05:14:14PM CEST:
>
> > > I'm trying to build both a static and a shared library. This used to
> > > work fine with libtool-1.4, but since I upgraded to libtool-1.5, I can't
> > > build a static library any more. I gave a try to the Chan
Hi Jeremie,
* Jeremie LE HEN wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 04:50:07PM CEST:
>
> This might be a very common question ; I checked the archives, but
> didn't find anything relevant, unfortunately.
Hmm, don't know. The problem is under-determined (read: we need more
information to give an answer).
Hi Ralf,
thanks for your fast reply.
> > This might be a very common question ; I checked the archives, but
> > didn't find anything relevant, unfortunately.
>
> Hmm, don't know. The problem is under-determined (read: we need more
> information to give an answer).
Yes sorry.
> > I'm trying to
20 matches
Mail list logo
