Re: somewhat misleading -no-undefined documentation

2010-10-12 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi Simon, Den 2010-10-12 11:19 skrev Simon Josefsson: > Ralf Wildenhues writes: > >> I kinda like Simon's patch you referenced (wow, that's old!), so how >> about this patch which takes from both your suggestions? > > I like it. Thanks, this closes a long-standing libtool concern of mine. > >

Re: somewhat misleading -no-undefined documentation

2010-10-12 Thread Simon Josefsson
Ralf Wildenhues writes: > I kinda like Simon's patch you referenced (wow, that's old!), so how > about this patch which takes from both your suggestions? I like it. Thanks, this closes a long-standing libtool concern of mine. Generally, having to use -no-undefined to get things to work on some

Re: somewhat misleading -no-undefined documentation

2010-10-09 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ adding libtool-patches ] Hi Matěj, * Matěj Týč wrote on Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 12:12:00AM CEST: > I have thought so far that if you want to make a DLL, you can't get > involved with any other library, because libtool needs -no-undefined > flag in order to make DLLs and you are supposed to use it