Hello C.J.,
* C.J. Adams-Collier wrote on Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 04:27:41AM CET:
> There was a thread some time ago (11/2004) about having a variable in .la
> files evaluated at runtime. This seems like a good idea to me, and would
> work well with pkg-config's ${pcfiledir} variable.
But it won't
Quoting Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
* Benoit Sigoure wrote on Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 07:32:13PM CET:
Quoting Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>* Benoit Sigoure wrote on Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 02:35:43PM CET:
>>
>>what's the right why of distributing binary packages that are relocatable
* Benoit Sigoure wrote on Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 07:32:13PM CET:
> Quoting Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >* Benoit Sigoure wrote on Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 02:35:43PM CET:
> >>
> >>what's the right why of distributing binary packages that are relocatable?
> >
> >With shared libraries: in genera
Quoting Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello Benoit,
* Benoit Sigoure wrote on Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 02:35:43PM CET:
what's the right why of distributing binary packages that are relocatable?
With shared libraries: in general, that is not possible portably.
Run paths encoded in librari
Hello Benoit,
* Benoit Sigoure wrote on Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 02:35:43PM CET:
>
> what's the right why of distributing binary packages that are relocatable?
With shared libraries: in general, that is not possible portably.
Run paths encoded in libraries and programs are usually absolute,
and some
