On Nov 16, 2009, at 5:26 PM, Ralf Wildenhues
wrote:
Why on earth do we have a commit script that just provides an opaque
interface to git?
FWIW, I never use it. Gary?
Originally, I wrote the commit script simply to automatically pull the
CVS commit log message with the ChangeLog, or to
Hi Peter,
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 05:16:15PM CET:
> For some reason our release procedure calls for running make
> distcheck 5 times. This is a tad onerous
Agreed.
> (one make distcheck takes almost an hour on my system).
Hmpf. If you have a multi-way system, try e.g.
On 11/16/2009 11:29 AM, David Fang wrote:
For some reason our release procedure calls for running make distcheck
5 times. This is a tad onerous (one make distcheck takes almost an
hour on my system).
HACKING asks for:
and `make distcheck CC=g++'
I think keeping CC=g++ might be a good idea beca
For some reason our release procedure calls for running make distcheck 5
times. This is a tad onerous (one make distcheck takes almost an hour on my
system).
HACKING asks for:
and `make distcheck CC=g++'
I think keeping CC=g++ might be a good idea because many users (self
included) use libl
