On 11/23/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No. The 1.5 branch is dead, and I don't recall anyone that desired
> turning it undead.
>
> If there is anything that 1.5.x gave you that you don't get from 2.2.x,
> then time to complain is *now* (well, *was* a long time ago, but anyway
* Alon Bar-Lev wrote on Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 03:42:45PM CET:
> On 11/23/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Committed like this.
> Thanks!
> Will you backport this to 1.5 branch?
No. The 1.5 branch is dead, and I don't recall anyone that desired
turning it undead.
If there is
On 11/23/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Committed like this.
>
> Cheers, and thanks,
> Ralf
Thanks!
Will you backport this to 1.5 branch?
Alon.
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Alon Bar-Lev wrote on Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:45:23AM CET:
--- a/libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh
+++ b/libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh
@@ -2156,7 +2156,7 @@ func_win32_libid ()
;;
*ar\ archive*) # could be an import, or static
if eval $OBJDUMP
* Alon Bar-Lev wrote on Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:45:23AM CET:
> --- a/libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh
> +++ b/libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh
> @@ -2156,7 +2156,7 @@ func_win32_libid ()
> ;;
>*ar\ archive*) # could be an import, or static
> if eval $OBJDUMP -f $1 | $SED -e '10q' 2>/dev/null |
>
Hello Alon,
* Alon Bar-Lev wrote on Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:45:23AM CET:
> On Wednesday 12 November 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > verify that this command fails:
> > make check-local TESTSUITEFLAGS='-v -d -x -k AC_WITH_LTDL'
> >
> > and post the output, then find out where exactly the failur
On Wednesday 12 November 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hallo Alon,
> verify that this command fails:
> make check-local TESTSUITEFLAGS='-v -d -x -k AC_WITH_LTDL'
>
> and post the output, then find out where exactly the failure happens
> during configure:
> cd tests/testsuite.dir/42
> ./con
Hallo Alon,
sorry for the long delay. Please don't top-post, thank you.
* Alon Bar-Lev wrote on Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 06:20:24PM CEST:
> On 10/21/08, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Alon Bar-Lev wrote on Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 03:19:50PM CEST:
> > > The func_win32_libid is not wo
Ralf?
This is the last task... OpenSSL, mingw64 and other projects already
accepted all patches to make this environment work.
libtool is the last one.
Alon.
On 10/27/08, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Raf,
>
> Any news?
> Can I do anything to help?
>
>
> Alon.
>
>
> On 10/21
Hello Raf,
Any news?
Can I do anything to help?
Alon.
On 10/21/08, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Used git head.
> Before I use cross compile, I tried to see if all tests pass on local
> compiler.
>
> My system (gentoo) has the following versions:
> sys-devel/m4-1.4.11
Hello Alon,
Thanks for the report.
* Alon Bar-Lev wrote on Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 03:19:50PM CEST:
>
> The func_win32_libid is not working correctly when win64 objects are found.
> The file format is "file format pe-x86-64".
>
> The attached patches for 1.5.26, 2.2.6a for the resulting libtool sc
11 matches
Mail list logo
