Hi Bob,
On 25 Aug 2010, at 22:43, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Nick Bowler wrote:
>> http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/qralston/writing/tagging-harmful/
>>
>> for details. Everything sent by this mailing list has the header:
>>
>> X-BeenThere: libtool@gnu.org
>>
>> which can be u
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Werner Koch wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:32, ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de said:
In order to be able to support Libtool on WinCE, we need somebody to be
able to test it regularly, for example before releases; also, we need to
be able to ask questions about it now and then. Ar
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Nick Bowler wrote:
http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/qralston/writing/tagging-harmful/
for details. Everything sent by this mailing list has the header:
X-BeenThere: libtool@gnu.org
which can be used to filter mails from the list. For example, I use the
following procmail
On 2010-08-25 06:40 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote:
> What would be nice about the autotools ML is having, in the subject,
> the name of the project > in bracket:
>
> Subject: [libtool]
>
> That can be done automatically (a configuration option in mailman, I
> guess). That would make me more aw
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:32, ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de said:
> In order to be able to support Libtool on WinCE, we need somebody to be
> able to test it regularly, for example before releases; also, we need to
> be able to ask questions about it now and then. Are you able to do this
I assume that thi
* David wrote on Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 04:31:08AM CEST:
> Instead of relying in only one person and possibly waiting for his response,
> how about to start supporting it in all other arches and disabling it on
> untested arches like WinCE?
That's not the point. The question was for some reorgani
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, David wrote:
On Martes 24 Agosto 2010 21:32:13 Ralf Wildenhues escribió:
* Vincent Torri wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:23:26PM CEST:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Vincent Torri wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:25:12PM CEST:
I Cc:ed you on the thread,
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Vincent Torri wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:23:26PM CEST:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Vincent Torri wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:25:12PM CEST:
I Cc:ed you on the thread, was that wrong? How can we reach you?
Please an
On Martes 24 Agosto 2010 21:32:13 Ralf Wildenhues escribió:
> * Vincent Torri wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:23:26PM CEST:
> > On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > >* Vincent Torri wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:25:12PM CEST:
> > >>>I Cc:ed you on the thread, was that wrong? How can
* Vincent Torri wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:23:26PM CEST:
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >* Vincent Torri wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:25:12PM CEST:
> >>>I Cc:ed you on the thread, was that wrong? How can we reach you?
> >
> >Please answer this. Without somebody to ask a
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Vincent, what about the other question I asked:
* Vincent Torri wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:25:12PM CEST:
I Cc:ed you on the thread, was that wrong? How can we reach you?
Please answer this. Without somebody to ask about WinCE we *can* *no
Vincent, what about the other question I asked:
* Vincent Torri wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:25:12PM CEST:
> >I Cc:ed you on the thread, was that wrong? How can we reach you?
Please answer this. Without somebody to ask about WinCE we *can* *not*
support it.
> >http://thread.gmane.org/gmane
That's unfortunate, because it cost us a couple of months now. :-/
I Cc:ed you on the thread, was that wrong? How can we reach you?
What is the problem with WinCE ?
See here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.general/10794/focus=9990
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libt
Hello Vincent,
* Vincent Torri wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:09:18PM CEST:
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> >* David wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 06:32:22PM CEST:
> >>I've been searching mailing list for supporting -flto in libtool, and seen
> >>several (commited?) patches.
>
Hey
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* David wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 06:32:22PM CEST:
I've been searching mailing list for supporting -flto in libtool, and seen
several (commited?) patches.
not yet committed, unfortunately; I had hoped for feedback from a person
knowledgeab
Hello David,
* David wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 06:32:22PM CEST:
> I've been searching mailing list for supporting -flto in libtool, and seen
> several (commited?) patches.
not yet committed, unfortunately; I had hoped for feedback from a person
knowledgeable with WinCE, but that didn't happe
On 04/07/2010 08:36 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Török Edwin wrote on Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 06:03:35PM CEST:
>> On 04/04/2010 11:54 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>>> I have a preliminary(!) patch set here for LTO support in libtool.
>
>> Thanks a lot for the patches, they worked fine so far!
>
> Th
* Török Edwin wrote on Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 06:03:35PM CEST:
> On 04/04/2010 11:54 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > I have a preliminary(!) patch set here for LTO support in libtool.
> Thanks a lot for the patches, they worked fine so far!
Thanks for testing.
> I'd have one more request: please ad
On 04/04/2010 11:54 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 05:33:44PM CEST:
>> I'm still working on a patch to support -flto in libtool, it needs
>> changes in several places.
>
> I have a preliminary(!) patch set here for LTO support in libtool.
Hi,
Thanks
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 05:33:44PM CEST:
>
> I'm still working on a patch to support -flto in libtool, it needs
> changes in several places.
I have a preliminary(!) patch set here for LTO support in libtool.
DO NOT submit this to your favorite distribution, it is not ready
Hello Simon,
* Simon Richter wrote on Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 01:12:08PM CEST:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 05:33:44PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> > * doc/libtool.texi (FAQ, Stripped link flags): New nodes.
> > (Wrapper executables): Replace bug address with macro.
> > (Compile mode,
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 05:33:44PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * doc/libtool.texi (FAQ, Stripped link flags): New nodes.
> (Wrapper executables): Replace bug address with macro.
> (Compile mode, Link mode): Document `-Wc,' and `-Xcompiler '
> semantics better.
Hmm, -Wc is
Hello Simon, Török, Åke,
* Simon Richter wrote on Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:11:13PM CET:
> I'm trying to use link time optimization with gcc 4.5, which somewhat
> works :), but requires the compiler flags to be passed to the linking
> step as well. libtool however removes them from the command line.
23 matches
Mail list logo
