Re: libtool-commit ML

2004-01-22 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > > But we do co-ordinate all patches, even trivial ones, on > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- so you can see what we're *going* to commit > before we do it. Many of these patches fall under the "48 hour rule" and the maintainer may not be immediately availab

Re: libtool-commit ML

2004-01-22 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 13:55, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > Nick Hudson wrote: > > | Is the libtool-commit ML supposed to work anymore? I've not seen a message > | there for sometime now. > > It is broken. > But we do co-ordinate all patches, even trivial ones, on [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- so you can see w

Re: libtool-commit ML

2004-01-22 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nick Hudson wrote: | Is the libtool-commit ML supposed to work anymore? I've not seen a message | there for sometime now. It is broken. Peter - -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin) Comme