> "Wesley" == Wesley W Terpstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Wesley> On linux using -L doesn't affect run-time search path, so
Wesley> my patch just uses that, but I understand that on other
Wesley> archs. it does affect search path (you don't use
Wesley> --Wl,rpath,/usr/foo/ba
> "Wesley" == Wesley W Terpstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Wesley> Sorry, none. I'm not a libtool hacker though. :-) Maybe
Wesley> someone else can solve it. However, the issue I see here
Wesley> is that it's hard for libtool to know that you aren't
Wesley> using the library
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 04:05:15PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > "Wesley" == Wesley W Terpstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Wesley> What I've been doing for debs with inter-depends is having
> Wesley> a local copy of ltmain.sh in my debian packages with the
> Wesley> patch applie
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 08:23:22AM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
> Kevin> Some Debian libtool packages (eg. libgtk1.2) seem to get
> Kevin> away with
>
> Kevin> ./configure --prefix=/usr
>
> Kevin> but then overriding that for the install
>
> Kevin> make prefix=`pwd`/debian/tmp/usr install
>
> "Wesley" == Wesley W Terpstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Wesley> What I've been doing for debs with inter-depends is having
Wesley> a local copy of ltmain.sh in my debian packages with the
Wesley> patch applied for building my project. Then it adds the
Wesley> right -L opti
> "Ganesan" == Ganesan Rajagopal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ganesan> The correct way to do this is actually ./configure
Ganesan> --prefix=/usr
Ganesan> make install DESTDIR=`pwd`/debian/tmp
Hmmm. didn't know this. Lets try it:
[624] [snoopy:bam] ~/source/cvs/libtool/depdemo >c
> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Kevin" == Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 01:50:57PM +1100, Brian May wrote: >
>>> Oh, another observation: installing the libraries in their
>>> non-final > location (as required for Debian packaging
> "Kevin" == Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 01:50:57PM +1100, Brian May wrote: >
>> Oh, another observation: installing the libraries in their
>> non-final > location (as required for Debian packaging tools,
>> probably Redhat too) > simply d
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 01:50:57PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > Oh, another observation: installing the libraries in their non-final
> > location (as required for Debian packaging tools, probably Redhat too)
> > simply does not work, as shown below. I think some of the required -L
> > options to
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 01:50:57PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> Oh, another observation: installing the libraries in their non-final
> location (as required for Debian packaging tools, probably Redhat too)
> simply does not work, as shown below. I think some of the required -L
> options to the linker
10 matches
Mail list logo
