Re: bfd and cygpath

2013-04-26 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2013-04-26 23:48, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2013-04-26 18:51, NightStrike wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> You had LD=i686-w64-mingw32-gcc, which will not make libtool happy. You >>> might try LD=i686-w64-mingw32-ld instead, but you shouldn't need to >>> specify L

Re: bfd and cygpath

2013-04-26 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2013-04-26 18:51, NightStrike wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2013-04-26 13:58, NightStrike wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: On 2013-04-24 22:24, NightStrike wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:16 PM, NightStrike >

Re: bfd and cygpath

2013-04-26 Thread NightStrike
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2013-04-26 13:58, NightStrike wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> On 2013-04-24 22:24, NightStrike wrote: On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:16 PM, NightStrike wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Peter R

Re: bfd and cygpath

2013-04-26 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2013-04-26 13:58, NightStrike wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2013-04-24 22:24, NightStrike wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:16 PM, NightStrike wrote: On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > So, it appears that LT_PATH_LD does not

Re: bfd and cygpath

2013-04-26 Thread NightStrike
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2013-04-24 22:24, NightStrike wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:16 PM, NightStrike wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: So, it appears that LT_PATH_LD does not like your ld? I'd look into that. >>> >>>

Re: bfd and cygpath

2013-04-24 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2013-04-24 22:24, NightStrike wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:16 PM, NightStrike wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> So, it appears that LT_PATH_LD does not like your ld? I'd look into >>> that. >> >> Where is the actual test that runs when that option is set?

Re: bfd and cygpath

2013-04-24 Thread NightStrike
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:16 PM, NightStrike wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2013-04-24 18:29, NightStrike wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:17 PM, NightStrike wrote: On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:55 AM, NightStrike wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 201

Re: bfd and cygpath

2013-04-24 Thread NightStrike
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2013-04-24 18:29, NightStrike wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:17 PM, NightStrike wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:55 AM, NightStrike wrote: On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2013-04-23 16:12, Nigh

Re: bfd and cygpath

2013-04-24 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2013-04-24 18:29, NightStrike wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:17 PM, NightStrike wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:55 AM, NightStrike wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: On 2013-04-23 16:12, NightStrike wrote: >>> > I can't find it in upstream libtoo

Re: bfd and cygpath

2013-04-24 Thread NightStrike
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:17 PM, NightStrike wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:55 AM, NightStrike wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >>> On 2013-04-23 16:12, NightStrike wrote: >> I can't find it in upstream libtool, though, so can somebody update libtool

Re: bfd and cygpath

2013-04-24 Thread NightStrike
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:55 AM, NightStrike wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2013-04-23 16:12, NightStrike wrote: > >>> I can't find it in upstream libtool, though, so can somebody update >>> libtool again? >> >> The only code branch in libtool.m4 that in the p

Re: bfd and cygpath

2013-04-24 Thread NightStrike
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2013-04-23 16:12, NightStrike wrote: >> I can't find it in upstream libtool, though, so can somebody update >> libtool again? > > The only code branch in libtool.m4 that in the past did set the > fix_srcfile_path variable can only be entere

Re: bfd and cygpath

2013-04-23 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2013-04-23 16:12, NightStrike wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:02 AM, NightStrike wrote: >> Building bfd in a particular cross compiler scenario requires that >> cygpath be set to "echo". bfd configury has the tools to do this, but >> it's broken. Configure properly does this: >> >> # test

Re: bfd and cygpath

2013-04-23 Thread NightStrike
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:02 AM, NightStrike wrote: > Building bfd in a particular cross compiler scenario requires that > cygpath be set to "echo". bfd configury has the tools to do this, but > it's broken. Configure properly does this: > > # test whether we have cygpath > if test -z "$CYGPATH_