Robert,
> IMHO it isn't worth the bother to allow both, I'll just revert patch.
> Everyone agree?
certainly :-) If the difference in shlib version numbering between
Solaris/Linux and IRIX is really a FAQ that causes user confusion, perhaps
this should be documented?
Rainer
___
Title: RE: Version numbering change on IRIX
Steve,
IMHO it isn't worth the bother to allow both, I'll just revert patch.
Everyone agree?
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Steve M. Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 8:21 PM
To: Boehne, Robe
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 05:34:33PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Robert,
>
> > This change was a long time coming, so many people have complained
> > about having libx.so.1 under Solars/Linux and having libx.so.2 under IRIX.
> > Adding 1 to the version isn't necessary, I've looked everywhere I could
Robert,
> This change was a long time coming, so many people have complained
> about having libx.so.1 under Solars/Linux and having libx.so.2 under IRIX.
> Adding 1 to the version isn't necessary, I've looked everywhere I could
> think of to find out why this was done in the first place, but found
Title: RE: Version numbering change on IRIX
Rainer,
This change was a long time coming, so many people have complained
about having libx.so.1 under Solars/Linux and having libx.so.2 under IRIX.
Adding 1 to the version isn't necessary, I've looked everywhere I could
think of to fi
