Thank you for information.
Alex
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello,
>
> * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, May 31, 2010 at 05:53:26PM CEST:
> > AFAIK Linux binaries/libraries can be built in the build tree with
> > no hardcoded references to other objects in the build
Hello,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, May 31, 2010 at 05:53:26PM CEST:
> AFAIK Linux binaries/libraries can be built in the build tree with
> no hardcoded references to other objects in the build tree, so they
> can always be copied into the install tree and continue working
> (although libtool h
On May 31, 2010, at 5:11 PM, Alex Farber wrote:
Sorry, I didn't understand the question. I just tried installation
without relink_command, by removing relink_command from .la file,
and it works. So, I wanted to know when it is really necessary.
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Tor Lillqvi
Sorry, I didn't understand the question. I just tried installation without
relink_command, by removing relink_command from .la file, and it works. So,
I wanted to know when it is really necessary.
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> What makes you think the issue relinking i
What makes you think the issue relinking is related to would have
anything to do with Linux in particular?
--tml
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
