Re: Problems with cvs-libtool and Solaris CC

2003-01-17 Thread Erik Assum
* Albert Chin | On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 10:13:10AM +0100, Erik Assum wrote: | > * Robert Boehne | > | Could you give a bit more detail as to what the problem is? | > | You say it compilains about "x", could you send us an | > | error message? | > | > Of course! | > | > [ snip snip ] | > (cd .libs

RE: Problems with cvs-libtool and Solaris CC

2003-01-08 Thread Boehne, Robert
Title: RE: Problems with cvs-libtool and Solaris CC Hello, I've looked at this in depth, and the problem does not appear for me. The main difference I see in my "libtool" script generated using Solaris CC is that AR="ar" for every tag.  As it should be, old_archi

Re: Problems with cvs-libtool and Solaris CC

2003-01-08 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Albert Chin wrote: > > > > CC: Outfile required when -xar flag is used > > > > As you see, CC is called with -xar, which I believe is correct, but I > > don't know what the `x' is supposed to do. As you saw in the previous > > mail, I found the following bit of code in the gener

Re: Problems with cvs-libtool and Solaris CC

2003-01-08 Thread Albert Chin
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 10:13:10AM +0100, Erik Assum wrote: > * Robert Boehne > | Could you give a bit more detail as to what the problem is? > | You say it compilains about "x", could you send us an > | error message? > > Of course! > > [ snip snip ] > (cd .libs/libtango.lax/libclient.a && /opt/

Re: Problems with cvs-libtool and Solaris CC

2003-01-08 Thread Erik Assum
* Robert Boehne | Could you give a bit more detail as to what the problem is? | You say it compilains about "x", could you send us an | error message? Of course! /opt/SUNWspro/bin/CC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. -I../../../include -I/segfs/tango/ORB/omniORB4.0.0/solaris7_CC/include -mt -mt

Re: Problems with cvs-libtool and Solaris CC

2003-01-07 Thread Robert Boehne
Erik, Could you give a bit more detail as to what the problem is? You say it compilains about "x", could you send us an error message? Robert Erik Assum wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm resending this message to the libtool list as I sent it directly > to Robert without realising that Reply-To: wasn't s