Robert Boehne wrote:
> I'm just about to make the release of Libtool 1.5. If anyone would
> like to test the current CVS on their favorite platform and report
> any problems, please do so! If not, your woes may have to wait for
> 1.5.1.
Here is yet another feature for libtool 1.5. I've already
Bill Northcott wrote:
>
> > Aside from the obvious problem of linking a shared library
> > to a static archive, which is not portable, I think this
> > is the source of your problem.
>
> I may be being dense, but I thought the point of libtool was to do things
> differently on different platform
> I notice in the problem link line, the shared libdefobj.4.dylib is
> linked to ../../avcall/.libs/libavcall.a twice.
Quite so, but it is libtool versions 1.4.2 or the current cvs that does
it. Libtool 1.4.3 does not put avcall on the command line twice and
produces functional libraries. Foll
Bill,
I notice in the problem link line, the shared libdefobj.4.dylib is
linked to ../../avcall/.libs/libavcall.a twice.
Aside from the obvious problem of linking a shared library
to a static archive, which is not portable, I think this
is the source of your problem. Can you tell us what happens
> I'm just about to make the release of Libtool 1.5. If anyone would
> like to test the current CVS on their favorite platform and report
> any problems, please do so! If not, your woes may have to wait for
> 1.5.1.
We are trying to build a complex libtoolised package (Swarm) on MacOSX.
The li
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 05:59:05PM +0100, Schleicher Ralph (LLI) wrote:
> 2003-02-11 Ralph Schleicher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * libtool.m4 (AC_LIBTOOL_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER): Prepend a dot to
> the value of the shrext (aka shared_ext) variable and delete it
> from the librar
Robert Boehne wrote:
> Yes, that would be fine.
> "Schleicher Ralph (LLI)" wrote:
> > My original patch required to explicitly add a dot. Do you accept a
> > patch that restores the original behavior?
I've attached the patch to this message.
Here is the ChangeLog entry:
2003-02-11 Ralph Sch
Ralph,
Yes, that would be fine.
Robert
"Schleicher Ralph (LLI)" wrote:
>
> Robert Boehne wrote:
>
> > I'm just about to make the release of Libtool 1.5. If anyone would
> > like to test the current CVS on their favorite platform and report
> > any problems, please do so! If not, your woes ma
Robert Boehne wrote:
> I'm just about to make the release of Libtool 1.5. If anyone would
> like to test the current CVS on their favorite platform and report
> any problems, please do so! If not, your woes may have to wait for
> 1.5.1.
The new option -shrext implies a leading dot for the shar
FWIW, "current" CVS (most recent changelog entry when I checkedout was
"2003-02-04 Nick Hudson ") has no new test failures
on cygwin.
autoconf-2.57
automake-1.7.2
cygwin-1.3.18-1
gcc-3.2-3
binutils-20021117-1
the only existing testsuite failures are two longstanding ones,
build-relink2 and q
>>> "Robert" == Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> Alexandre,
Robert> Snapshots of CVS are made daily and reside at
Robert> ftp://alpha.gnu.org/pub/gnu/cvs/libtool.tgz
CVS snapshots are differents from `make dist' tarballs. The
former still requires maintainer tools like Autoco
Alexandre,
Snapshots of CVS are made daily and reside at
ftp://alpha.gnu.org/pub/gnu/cvs/libtool.tgz
I'm not sure where to announce a pending release other
than here, but I had just intended to re-release after
bugs were fixed & found in 1.5. If you have a suggestion
on where to announce the pre-
>>> "Robert" == Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> Hello,
Robert> I'm just about to make the release of Libtool 1.5. If anyone would
Robert> like to test the current CVS on their favorite platform and report
Robert> any problems, please do so! If not, your woes may have to wai
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 01:10:54AM -0600, Robert Boehne wrote:
> I'm just about to make the release of Libtool 1.5. If anyone would
> like to test the current CVS on their favorite platform and report
> any problems, please do so! If not, your woes may have to wait for
> 1.5.1.
What date do you
Robert Boehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I'm just about to make the release of Libtool 1.5. If anyone would
> like to test the current CVS on their favorite platform and report
> any problems, please do so! If not, your woes may have to wait for
> 1.5.1.
Perhaps we could have the fix for OS
Robert Boehne wrote:
>I'm just about to make the release of Libtool 1.5. If anyone would
>like to test the current CVS on their favorite platform and report
>any problems, please do so! If not, your woes may have to wait for
>1.5.1.
Here are the non-PASS results I obtain with `make check' on an
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Robert Boehne wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm just about to make the release of Libtool 1.5. If anyone would
> like to test the current CVS on their favorite platform and report
> any problems, please do so! If not, your woes may have to wait for
> 1.5.1.
Please make sure that the l
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 04:10 PM, Robert Boehne wrote:
Hello,
I'm just about to make the release of Libtool 1.5. If anyone would
like to test the current CVS on their favorite platform and report
any problems, please do so! If not, your woes may have to wait for
1.5.1.
Okay, then
Approved and checking in to CVS head.
Robert
Nick Hudson wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 04 February 2003 7:10 am, Robert Boehne wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm just about to make the release of Libtool 1.5. If anyone would
> > like to test the current CVS on their favorite platform and report
> > any prob
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 7:10 am, Robert Boehne wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm just about to make the release of Libtool 1.5. If anyone would
> like to test the current CVS on their favorite platform and report
> any problems, please do so! If not, your woes may have to wait for
> 1.5.1.
OK, here's
20 matches
Mail list logo
