Hello Dan, Tim,
* Dan Nicholson wrote on Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 08:32:57PM CET:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Tim Mooney wrote:
> >
> > I thought the reason that distros remove .la files is because some distro
> > vendors feel that libtool often establishes direct link dependencies that
> > aren
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Tim Mooney
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In regard to: Re: Multiple -rpaths, Ralf Wildenhues said (at 8:21am on
> Nov...:
>
>> * Jan Engelhardt wrote on Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 07:58:36AM CET:
>>>
>>> So I guess the reasons why
In regard to: Re: Multiple -rpaths, Ralf Wildenhues said (at 8:21am on Nov...:
* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 07:58:36AM CET:
So I guess the reasons why distros remove the .la files is because
they are within the default search paths.
Yes; and because some versions of
* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 07:58:36AM CET:
>
> So I guess the reasons why distros remove the .la files is because
> they are within the default search paths.
Yes; and because some versions of libtool did the wrong thing wrt.
multi-ABI systems like x86_64. (BTW if there are st
On Monday 2008-11-03 22:59, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 09:14:31AM CET:
>> * Jan Engelhardt wrote on Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 07:39:56AM CET:
>> > Is not that what libtool is supposed to cover up? Maybe not for every
>> > make invocation à la `make LD=zzzld`
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 09:14:31AM CET:
> * Jan Engelhardt wrote on Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 07:39:56AM CET:
> > Is not that what libtool is supposed to cover up? Maybe not for every
> > make invocation à la `make LD=zzzld`, but perhaps determining the
> > type of ld at configur
* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 07:39:56AM CET:
> On Sunday 2008-11-02 21:56, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 05:24:27PM CET:
> >>
> >> I have two libraries in paths that are not searched by default (e.g.
> >> /opt/foo/lib). So I have this i
Hi Ralf,
On Sunday 2008-11-02 21:56, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 05:24:27PM CET:
>>
>> I have two libraries in paths that are not searched by default (e.g.
>> /opt/foo/lib). So I have this in my pkgconfig files:
>>
>> foo.pc: Libs:-L${libdir} -
On Sunday 2008-11-02 20:22, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Nov 2008, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>
>> I have two libraries in paths that are not searched by default (e.g.
>> /opt/foo/lib). So I have this in my pkgconfig files:
>>
>> foo.pc: Libs:-L${libdir} -lfoo
>> bar.pc: Libs:-L
Hi Jan,
* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 05:24:27PM CET:
>
> I have two libraries in paths that are not searched by default (e.g.
> /opt/foo/lib). So I have this in my pkgconfig files:
>
> foo.pc: Libs: -L${libdir} -lfoo
> bar.pc: Libs: -L${libdir} -lbar
>
> The linker will find
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
I have two libraries in paths that are not searched by default (e.g.
/opt/foo/lib). So I have this in my pkgconfig files:
foo.pc: Libs: -L${libdir} -lfoo
bar.pc: Libs: -L${libdir} -lbar
The linker will find -lfoo,-lbar and successfully create the o
On Sat, 2004-05-15 at 15:20, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-05-15 at 02:27 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
>
> > I'm getting this warning (using libtool 1.5.6):
> >
> > libtool: link: warning: ignoring multiple `-rpath's for a libtool library
> >
> > I'm trying to build a module
On Sat, 2004-05-15 at 02:27 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> I'm getting this warning (using libtool 1.5.6):
>
> libtool: link: warning: ignoring multiple `-rpath's for a libtool library
>
> I'm trying to build a module and I'm only explicitly adding one rpath in
> LDFLAGS. The first one
13 matches
Mail list logo
