Miert fizetsz az internetert? Korlatlan, ingyenes internet hozzaferes a FreeStarttol.
Probald ki most! http://www.freestart.hu
szombat 29 mÃjus 2004 12:41 dÃtummal ezt Ãrta:
> On May 28, 2004, Szombathelyi GyÃrgy <[EMAIL PROTECTE
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alexandre Oliva
> On May 28, 2004, Szombathelyi GyÃrgy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > AFAIK it's possible to link in libdep to libfoo if libdep is static
>
> Depends on the platform. Some combinations
On May 28, 2004, Szombathelyi GyÃrgy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AFAIK it's possible to link in libdep to libfoo if libdep is static
Depends on the platform. Some combinations of OSs, ABIs and hardware
architectures don't allow non-PIC in shared libraries. Yes, several
of the platforms that do
Friday 28 May 2004 09:27 dátummal ezt írta:
> And there's another problem. When libtool passes -ldependency in the
> command line, the linker will look for libdependency in the
> directories where it looks for libraries (-L). If libdependency is
> only brought in by another shared library that h
On May 26, 2004, Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It also depends on libtool being 100% accurate in determining if a
> library is a static library or a shared library since static
> libraries don't support library dependencies.
And there's another problem. When libtool passes -ldepen
Hello!
Bob Friesenhahn írta:
It is not an easy task to intuit which systems require the full linkage
list and which will work properly with an abbreviated list. Even older
Linux versions require the full linkage list (or several copies thereof!).
A further problem is that libtool doesn't reliabl
Hello!
Scott James Remnant Ãrta:
Patch was written and rejected;
The Debian libtool packages include it.
What was the reason of the rejection? The static - dynamic library
issue? As I see from the debian diff, it has some logic to find out if
the linked libraries are static or dynamic. Can it be
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 08:07 +0200, Szombathelyi GyÃrgy wrote:
> > Yes, I read the thread. I agree that libtool should perform the
> > optimization you want but I don't see it as something that is a
> > show-stopper.
> >
> I agree that it isn't a show-stopper, but it would be very nice if
> libto
Hi!
Here's another description of the problem, so I'm not the only one who
think that a solution is needed. They mention pkg-config, not libtool,
so maybe a fix required in pkg-config, too, but as I read the TODO in
libtool, there are common goals in these projects, so the root of the
problem s
On Wed, 26 May 2004, Szombathelyi György wrote:
Yes, I read the thread. I agree that libtool should perform the
optimization you want but I don't see it as something that is a
show-stopper.
I agree that it isn't a show-stopper, but it would be very nice if libtool
could handle this. Can someone ad
Hello!
Yes, I read the thread. I agree that libtool should perform the
optimization you want but I don't see it as something that is a
show-stopper.
I agree that it isn't a show-stopper, but it would be very nice if
libtool could handle this. Can someone add this 'feature' to the libtool
TODO lis
On Mon, 24 May 2004, Albert Chin wrote:
Of course the correct answer is that not linking against indirect
dependencies is non-portable. Certainly Microsoft Windows DLLs
require full linkage, and I believe/suspect that AIX does as well.
I don't see it that way. If a backend optimization can be done
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 11:37:38AM +0200, Szombathelyi_GyXrgy wrote:
> >On Mon, 24 May 2004, Albert Chin wrote:
> >
> >>dependency_libs doesn't contain just libraries. Maybe LDFLAGS as well,
> >>like -pthread. BTW, is it _really_ a problem to link against
> >>everything in dependency_libs? Indirect
Bob Friesenhahn írta:
On Mon, 24 May 2004, Albert Chin wrote:
dependency_libs doesn't contain just libraries. Maybe LDFLAGS as well,
like -pthread. BTW, is it _really_ a problem to link against
everything in dependency_libs? Indirectly, this is going to happen
anyway even if libtool doesn't do this
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 07:32:01PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Mon, 24 May 2004, Albert Chin wrote:
>
> >On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 08:19:00AM +0200, Szombathelyi Gy?rgy wrote:
> >>I've just curious if is it possible _not_ to link a program/lib against
> >>its indirect dependencies. I mean if
On Mon, 24 May 2004, Albert Chin wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 08:19:00AM +0200, Szombathelyi Gy?rgy wrote:
I've just curious if is it possible _not_ to link a program/lib against
its indirect dependencies. I mean if libC is linked against libB and
libB is against libA then libtool will link libC
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 08:19:00AM +0200, Szombathelyi Gy?rgy wrote:
> I've just curious if is it possible _not_ to link a program/lib against
> its indirect dependencies. I mean if libC is linked against libB and
> libB is against libA then libtool will link libC against libA, which is
> not ne
17 matches
Mail list logo
