On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 01:03:43PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Olly Betts wrote on Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:28:41AM CEST:
> > I've tried it now. I didn't have to modify any of the configure scripts
> > at all.
>
> Any self-grown or third-party macros that use exit(3) in compile tests?
Not t
* Olly Betts wrote on Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:28:41AM CEST:
> On 2006-05-16, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Feel free, any kind of feedback is helpful. Esp. we're looking for
> > packages that are broken by the new Autoconf, so that unintended
> > incompatibilities can be fixed bef
On 2006-05-16, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Feel free, any kind of feedback is helpful. Esp. we're looking for
> packages that are broken by the new Autoconf, so that unintended
> incompatibilities can be fixed before the release.
I've tried it now. I didn't have to modify any of
Hi Olly,
* Olly Betts wrote on Tue, May 16, 2006 at 01:48:55AM CEST:
> On 2006-05-10, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Olly Betts wrote on Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:38:08PM CEST:
>
> > I know Libtool-1.5.24 is important to get out, due to the regressions I
> > put in 1.5.22. And it
On 2006-05-10, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Olly Betts wrote on Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:38:08PM CEST:
>> Is there likely to be a 1.5.24 release soon?
>
> Oh dear. Don't ask about my original plans. They were something like
> this: have Autoconf-2.60 in March, then Libtool-1.5.24
