Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-04-01 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Thursday 15 February 2001 4:47 am, Sam TH wrote: > On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 09:12:12PM -0600, Sam TH wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 01:02:52AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > > On Feb 6, 2001, Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode-link c++ -o foo lib1.la

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-27 Thread Sam TH
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 08:04:29PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Feb 24, 2001, Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 12:18:13AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > >> It seems this was fully intentional. In fact, the code says > >> > >> # Make sure that $var conta

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-27 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Alexandre Oliva writes: > I can't find this entry in my copy of ChangeLog. Are you sure this is > >from libtool's CVS tree? http://subversions.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/libtool/ltmain.in?only_with_tag=ild-branch Revision 1.79.2.2 Seems like the ChangeLog in the main branch was reduced down to "m

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-26 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Feb 24, 2001, Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 12:18:13AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> It seems this was fully intentional. In fact, the code says >> >> # Make sure that $var contains only unique libraries >> # and add them in reverse order This is definitel

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-26 Thread Sam TH
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 07:54:33PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Feb 24, 2001, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It seems this was fully intentional. In fact, the code says > > > # Make sure that $var contains only unique libraries > > # and add them in

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-26 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Feb 24, 2001, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems this was fully intentional. In fact, the code says > # Make sure that $var contains only unique libraries > # and add them in reverse order > The ChangeLog only has > * ltmain.in: Merged Thomas' ild-pa

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-24 Thread Sam TH
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 12:18:13AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Alexandre Oliva writes: > > > > But this bug is really hindering my ability to do anything at all, > > > > Did you get to try the multi-language branch? I don't think this bug > > is present in it. > > This behaviour exists in

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Alexandre Oliva writes: > > But this bug is really hindering my ability to do anything at all, > > Did you get to try the multi-language branch? I don't think this bug > is present in it. This behaviour exists in both MAIN and the ML branch. It was introduced in ltmain.in rev. 1.79.2.2 (ILD br

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-24 Thread Sam TH
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 07:34:08PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Feb 24, 2001, Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ok, this is the third reply to this mail that I've sent. > > Sorry. It seems that all of us have been busy lately. > > > But this bug is really hindering my ability to do

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-24 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Feb 24, 2001, Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, this is the third reply to this mail that I've sent. Sorry. It seems that all of us have been busy lately. > But this bug is really hindering my ability to do anything at all, Did you get to try the multi-language branch? I don't think

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-24 Thread Sam TH
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 01:02:52AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Feb 6, 2001, Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode-link c++ -o foo lib1.la lib2.la lib1.la \ > > lib2.la lib1.la lib2.la > > > Which is what I want. However, libtool then issues this command. >

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-14 Thread Sam TH
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 09:12:12PM -0600, Sam TH wrote: > On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 01:02:52AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > On Feb 6, 2001, Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode-link c++ -o foo lib1.la lib2.la lib1.la \ > > > lib2.la lib1.la lib2.la > > > >

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-06 Thread Sam TH
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 01:02:52AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Feb 6, 2001, Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode-link c++ -o foo lib1.la lib2.la lib1.la \ > > lib2.la lib1.la lib2.la > > > Which is what I want. However, libtool then issues this command. >

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-02-06 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Feb 6, 2001, Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode-link c++ -o foo lib1.la lib2.la lib1.la \ > lib2.la lib1.la lib2.la > Which is what I want. However, libtool then issues this command. > c++ -o foo ./libs/lib1.a ./libs/lib2.a Which version of libtool are you usi