On 10/1/2010 4:22 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Charles Wilson
> wrote:
^^^
>> Please, over the past three months there were hundreds of messages
>> discussing sysroot and how it shoold be handled. While libtool's
>> support is not yet c
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Charles Wilson
wrote:
> Please, over the past three months there were hundreds of messages
> discussing sysroot and how it shoold be handled. While libtool's
> support is not yet complete, what IS there is the result of those
> discussions. Please read them; I hav
On 10/1/2010 2:23 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> I wanted to see the process this way...
>
> export SYSROOT=/tmp/root1
>
> package1: ./configure
> package1: make install DESTDIR=/tmp/root1
>
> package2: ./configure
> package2: make install DESTDIR=/tmp/root2
What you are missing is that "sysroot" is
> package1: ./configure
> package1: make install DESTDIR=/tmp/root1
>
> package2: ./configure
> package2: make install DESTDIR=/tmp/root2
>
> 1. No need to update existing builds, adding --with-sysroot to all
> configure statements is harder.
Hardly impossible though.
> 2. You can assume DESTDIR
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 09/27/2010 03:41 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the explanation!
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Ralf Wildenhues
>> wrote:
Also, why not take the value of the sysroot from the DESTDIR automake
variable
On 9/30/2010 7:19 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Note that it's perfectly possible to use .la files on the final system
> that didn't go through "libtool --mode=finish", as long as all the
> packages you compile are upgraded to Libtool 2.4 (and IIUC, cygwin's
> packaging system for example is already r
On 09/27/2010 03:41 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Thanks for the explanation!
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Also, why not take the value of the sysroot from the DESTDIR automake variable?
Because we know DESTDIR far too late, only at 'make install' time and
not yet at th
Hello Alon,
* Alon Bar-Lev wrote on Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 03:41:36PM CEST:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >> Also, why not take the value of the sysroot from the DESTDIR automake
> >> variable?
> >
> > Because we know DESTDIR far too late, only at 'make install' time a
Thanks for the explanation!
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> Also, why not take the value of the sysroot from the DESTDIR automake
>> variable?
>
> Because we know DESTDIR far too late, only at 'make install' time and
> not yet at the time we link against dependent lib
Hello Alon,
* Alon Bar-Lev wrote on Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:53:36AM CEST:
> > - Sysroot support. This allows you to build cross-compiled packages
> > with the same prefix that will be used on the destination machine,
> > and still find dependent libraries under the compiler's "sysroot".
> > Withou
I wondered the same as did Alon.
Also I noticed that httpd version 2.2.16
failed compilation with libtool version 2.4 installed
Compile log looks like:
found apr source: srclib/apr
found apr-util source: srclib/apr-util
rebuilding srclib/apr/configure
buildconf: checking installation...
buildconf
> New in 2.4 2010-09-22:
>
> • New features:
> - Sysroot support. This allows you to build cross-compiled packages
> with the same prefix that will be used on the destination machine,
> and still find dependent libraries under the compiler's "sysroot".
> Without sysroot support, paths intern
12 matches
Mail list logo
