* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 03:09:23PM CEST:
> * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 03:43:34PM CEST:
> > Peter O'Gorman writes:
> > >
> > > Perhaps instead of going through hoops here we need to rethink the whole
> > > idea of using tar to keep the timestamps accurat
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Thanks, also to Peter.
I was unsure whether libtoolize should be changed to copy in order as
well (and _not_ preserve time stamps). A `libtoolize --copy --force'
would then assure that copied files are newer than any other files in
the existing source
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 05:19:47PM CEST:
> On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> >OK. Let's just install them in the correct order. libtoolize can still
> >use the `tar' pipe to keep the time stamps on the way from the
> >installatinon dir to the user package so
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
OK. Let's just install them in the correct order. libtoolize can still
use the `tar' pipe to keep the time stamps on the way from the
installatinon dir to the user package source tree.
Proposed patch OK for branch-1-5? Unfortunately, the forward por
