Re: -F parameter appears not to be passed in OS X

2005-08-02 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Matthew Landauer wrote: Thanks for that! That's a really good workaround. I'm productive again! :-) Maybe I'm misunderstanding things but shouldn't libtool understand "-F"? It knows how to interpret -framework and -F goes with that as much as -L goes along with -l for normal linking. Most pe

Re: -F parameter appears not to be passed in OS X

2005-08-02 Thread Matthew Landauer
It's for linking against the SDK for Apple's Shake (2d compositing package) which by default puts its frameworks in /Applications/Shake/sdk/Frameworks (for Shake version 4) or /Applications/Shake3.50/sdk/Frameworks (for Shake version 3.5). Matthew Matthew Landauer wrote: Thanks for that! Th

Re: -F parameter appears not to be passed in OS X

2005-08-01 Thread Matthew Landauer
Thanks for that! That's a really good workaround. I'm productive again! :-) Maybe I'm misunderstanding things but shouldn't libtool understand "-F"? It knows how to interpret -framework and -F goes with that as much as -L goes along with -l for normal linking. Matthew On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Ma

Re: -F parameter appears not to be passed in OS X

2005-08-01 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Matthew Landauer wrote: Using libtool 1.5.18 on OS X 10.4: % libtool --mode=link g++ -module -o foo.la -rpath /usr/local/lib -F/foo -framework frame Runs: g++ ${wl}-flat_namespace ${wl}-undefined ${wl}suppress -o .libs/foo.0.0.0.so -bundle -framework frame But would e