Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts inincluded.a]

2002-12-06 Thread Robert Boehne
Tom, Are you volunteering to convert the shell functions in CVS Libtool into non-shell-function code? I would like to see this discussion go in a different direction. I would like to see a list of the platforms known to NOT have shell functions in their Bourne shells. My point is that there are

Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts inincluded.a]

2002-11-15 Thread Tom Lord
> I don't see the urgency to move to shell functions, but I do > see how they can simplify our lives. Uh... "if not now, when"? Seriously, there's _always_ commercial incentive to do a half assed job and the _real_ ego competition is to reject that incentive and do a good jo

Re: [shell functions, was RE: solving of name conflicts inincluded.a]

2002-11-15 Thread Akim Demaille
Bruce> Bootstrap-Bash could use a frozen version of configure. This means freezing at least one copy of Bash. Doable. But I still think it might be a bit too soon. I don't see the urgency to move to shell functions, but I do see how they can simplify our lives.