Hi Pavel,
Many thanks for the patch!
> On Dec 8, 2014, at 2:16 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> On Saturday 06 of December 2014 14:36:23 Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>> Iteration #0. Patch (for discussion, not push) implementing configure
>> time PREPEND_LIB_DLSEARCH_PATH variable. Possible enhancements
On Saturday 06 of December 2014 14:36:23 Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Iteration #0. Patch (for discussion, not push) implementing configure
> time PREPEND_LIB_DLSEARCH_PATH variable. Possible enhancements for future
> could be {APPEND_,}LIB_DLSEARCH_PATH and
> {,APPEND_,PREPEND_}LIB_SEARCH_PATH.
Itera
On Friday 05 of December 2014 12:11:57 Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > Yes, we can use ac_cv_ workaround globally, but that is not
> > ideal as this turns off the ld.so.conf parsing in libtool (which works
> > pretty well to reimplement).
> >
> > ... so yet another idea. What about have some API e
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Use ldconfig to generate sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec so that internal library
search paths as well as all /etc/ld.so.conf and /etc/ld.so.conf.d/*.conf
entries are present.
It seems unwise to use ldconfig output as authoritative information
since ldcon
On 12/04/2014 10:51 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Hi Orion,
>
>> On Aug 12, 2014, at 6:50 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>
>> Orion Poplawski cora.nwra.com> writes:
>>> After almost 7 years, it would be really nice to get this fixed. Does this
>>> help?
>>>
>>> From 9576fe6d88eb2f448b1e87422449bfc7
Hi Pavel,
> On Dec 5, 2014, at 11:58 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> On Friday 05 of December 2014 10:56:28 Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>> This really needs to be sorted out.
>>> However this approach does not match the s390x at least.
>>
>> As in `case $host_cpu in *64*|s390x) ...` ? I can add that i
On Friday 05 of December 2014 10:56:28 Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > This really needs to be sorted out.
> > However this approach does not match the s390x at least.
>
> As in `case $host_cpu in *64*|s390x) ...` ? I can add that if you'd like?
That would be at least better :), but I would still need
Hi Pavel,
> On Dec 5, 2014, at 10:07 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> On Thursday 04 of December 2014 17:51:28 Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> Hi Orion,
>> [...]
>> Does this work for you?
>>
>> diff --git a/m4/libtool.m4 b/m4/libtool.m4
>> [...]
>> + case $host_cpu in
>> +# match at least x86_64, i
On Thursday 04 of December 2014 17:51:28 Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Hi Orion,
> [...]
> Does this work for you?
>
> diff --git a/m4/libtool.m4 b/m4/libtool.m4
> [...]
> + case $host_cpu in
> +# match at least x86_64, ia64, powerpc64*
> +*64*) sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec="/lib64 /usr/lib64
>
Hi Orion,
> On Aug 12, 2014, at 6:50 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> Orion Poplawski cora.nwra.com> writes:
>> After almost 7 years, it would be really nice to get this fixed. Does this
>> help?
>>
>> From 9576fe6d88eb2f448b1e87422449bfc7dba42c29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Olly Betts s
Orion Poplawski cora.nwra.com> writes:
> After almost 7 years, it would be really nice to get this fixed. Does this
> help?
>
> From 9576fe6d88eb2f448b1e87422449bfc7dba42c29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Olly Betts survex.com>
> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:53:51 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] Use ldc
Christian Rössel gmx.de> writes:
>
> Olly Betts survex.com> writes:
>
> >
> > On 2007-06-19, Peter O'Gorman pogma.com> wrote:
> > > I am inclined to vote for (1) for now. It might be worth a figuring out
> > > how to have ldconfig (or some other utility) output the real search path
> > > tha
12 matches
Mail list logo
