Il 10.08.2015 09:19 Peter Rosin ha scritto:
> Since the patch
changes branches that were formerly mingw but not
> cygwin, I guess that
the patch is aiming for changing the case where
> msys is used in its
normal use case targeting MSVCRT. If I have
> assumed wrong here, then
the patch is clea
On 2015-08-09 21:26, fabrizio...@tiscali.it wrote:
> The output of uname -o is indeed the same in MSYS2 and MinGW/MSYS
>
> Msys
>
> However, that is irrelevant because, config.guess does not use uname -o, it
> does uname -s
>
> UNAME_SYSTEM=`(uname -s) 2>/dev/null` || UNAME_SYSTEM=unknown
>
>
The output of uname -o is indeed the same in MSYS2 and
MinGW/MSYS
Msys
However, that is irrelevant because, config.guess does
not use uname -o, it does uname -s
UNAME_SYSTEM=`(uname -s)
2>/dev/null` || UNAME_SYSTEM=unknown
The output of uname -s is
different between MSYS2 and the old MinGW/MS
[ mingw-users: this is in reply to a suggested patch (1) ]
On 2015-07-23 19:30, fabrizio...@tiscali.it wrote:
> Hello,
> when using the MSYS2 shell (http://msys2.github.io/), uname -o returns Msys
> instead of mingw32. The latest versions of config.guess and config.sub
> already support that, bu
