On Sep 4, 2000, Paul Sokolovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But now, I think that's just too messed, It would be easier to add
> --bindir= option to libtool --mode=install and teach automake supply
> it.
Yep, this is probably the most reasonable solution. But there are
still problems. Think
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Sokolovsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 04, 2000 8:34 PM
> To: Charles S. Wilson
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re[2]: DLL naming conventions
>
>
Hello Paul,
> Before I go for it, let me summary some PE-DLL idiosycrasies
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 07:40:09PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> Hello Charles,
>
> Charles S. Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> CSW> Well, the problem with libtool is that it's a developer's tool. Take
> CSW> the gettext package, for instance. It uses some version of libtool that
> CSW>
On Sep 1, 2000, Paul Sokolovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes. And know why? Because they want to support outdated betas!
Come on. I've already posted a message saying that we should probably
give up on supporting early betas, as long as we detect them as such
and disable the creation o
