Re: Link static library into libtool library

2000-07-20 Thread Ossama Othman
Hi, On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 04:01:10PM -0400, Paul Berrevoets wrote: > Thomas Tanner wrote: > > > Yep. That's already implemented in CVS libtool: > > Just a minor question ... does CVS libtool require CVS autoconf and/or CVS > automake? No. The multi-language branch should work with stable a

Re: Link static library into libtool library

2000-07-20 Thread Paul Berrevoets
Thomas Tanner wrote: > Yep. That's already implemented in CVS libtool: Just a minor question ... does CVS libtool require CVS autoconf and/or CVS automake? -- Thanks, Paul

Re: Link static library into libtool library

2000-07-20 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 10:02:55PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Jul 19, 2000, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi - > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 07:10:13PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > >> [...] > >> > libtool: link: cannot build libtool library `libfoo.la' from non-libt

Re: Link static library into libtool library

2000-07-20 Thread Thomas Tanner
On 19-Jul-2000 Chris wrote: >> > On Solaris, libtool does not allow me to do the following: >> >> /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -o libfoo.la -rpath >> > /usr/local/lib foo.lo /usr/local/lib/libbar.a >> > libtool: link: cannot build libtool library `libfoo.la' from non-libtool >> >

RE: Link static library into libtool library

2000-07-20 Thread Thomas Tanner
On 19-Jul-2000 Paul Berrevoets wrote: >> /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -o libfoo.la -rpath > /usr/local/lib foo.lo /usr/local/lib/libbar.a > libtool: link: cannot build libtool library `libfoo.la' from non-libtool > objects: /usr/local/lib/libbar.a > > and yet the Solaris linker a

Re: Link static library into libtool library

2000-07-19 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Jul 19, 2000, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> >> On Jul 19, 2000, Paul Berrevoets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > On Solaris, libtool does not allow me to do the following: >> >> /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -o libfoo.la -rpath >> > /usr/local/

Re: Link static library into libtool library

2000-07-19 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Jul 19, 2000, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi - > On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 07:10:13PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> [...] >> > libtool: link: cannot build libtool library `libfoo.la' from non-libtool >> > objects: /usr/local/lib/libbar.a >> >> Libtool is right. It can't

Re: Link static library into libtool library

2000-07-19 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
Hi - On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 07:10:13PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > [...] > > libtool: link: cannot build libtool library `libfoo.la' from non-libtool > > objects: /usr/local/lib/libbar.a > > Libtool is right. It can't be done portably, so libtool won't do it > for you. libtool would be mo

Re: Link static library into libtool library

2000-07-19 Thread Chris
Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > On Jul 19, 2000, Paul Berrevoets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Solaris, libtool does not allow me to do the following: > >> /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -o libfoo.la -rpath > > /usr/local/lib foo.lo /usr/local/lib/libbar.a > > libtool: link: canno

Re: Link static library into libtool library

2000-07-19 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Jul 19, 2000, Paul Berrevoets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Solaris, libtool does not allow me to do the following: >> /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -o libfoo.la -rpath > /usr/local/lib foo.lo /usr/local/lib/libbar.a > libtool: link: cannot build libtool library `libfoo.la' fr