Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:Pine.GSO.4.44.0210151350390.21156-20@;scooby.simplesystems.org:
> The attached patch to FSF CVS libtool is intended to make libtool
> (mostly) behave as it does for Cygwin when executed with MinGW. It
> consists of contributions from Elizabet
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> Is your patch against CVS head? Or the release 1.4.2?
CVS head.
Bob
>
> Earnie.
>
> Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > The attached patch to FSF CVS libtool is intended to make libtool
> > (mostly) behave as it does for Cygwin when executed with MinGW. It
> >
Is your patch against CVS head? Or the release 1.4.2?
Earnie.
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> The attached patch to FSF CVS libtool is intended to make libtool
> (mostly) behave as it does for Cygwin when executed with MinGW. It
> consists of contributions from Elizabeth Barham, and my own efforts.
>
Max Bowsher wrote:
> Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
>>The MinGW patch uses lib-.dll for DLL naming,
>
>
> I thought the consensus was -.dll (no lib)? Or am I
> remembering wrongly?
>
I prefer Bob's method.
Earnie.
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTE
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
> The MinGW patch uses lib-.dll for DLL naming, otherwise
> the naming is the same as Cygwin.
Cool. I'm happy.
> This problem has already been anticipated and addressed.
Good to know.
> The patch looks for an existing Cygwin installation and tries to
> overwri
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> The MinGW patch uses lib-.dll for DLL naming,
I thought the consensus was -.dll (no lib)? Or am I
remembering wrongly?
Max.
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Please note that Cygwin's patched libtool contains a modification
to postinstall_cmds, which I suspect is related to ../bin, as it
involves calling basename.
>>
>> Yes, but this may be part of the Cygwin scheme which hasn't yet made
>> it into mainline CVS.
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
A modified version of this patch is now in libtool CVS. The best way
to verify that it works is to try libtool CVS for your packages under
MinGW and Cygwin (one Cygwin part was modified so the implementation
could be shared).
Note that installing DLLs into $(libdir)/../bin seems to be a bit of a
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> The attached patch to FSF CVS libtool is intended to make libtool
> (mostly) behave as it does for Cygwin when executed with MinGW. It
> consists of contributions from Elizabeth Barham, and my own efforts.
>
> The DLLs are installed to $(libdir)/../bin as they current
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Charles Wilson wrote:
>
> quick question: what pattern is used to name the dlls, implibs, and
>
> statlibs? (I don't care, I just want to avoid confusion with the cygwin DLL
>
> names). On cygwin, we use:
>
>cyg-.dll (where number= 'current' - 'age')
>lib.dll.a
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Max Bowsher wrote:
>>> I am posting this patch with the expectation that concerned parties
>>> will inspect it, test it, and send any fixes so that it can be
>>> incorporated in libtool 1.5.
>>
>> Please note that Cygwin's patched libtool contains a mo
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Max Bowsher wrote:
> > I am posting this patch with the expectation that concerned parties
> > will inspect it, test it, and send any fixes so that it can be
> > incorporated in libtool 1.5.
>
> Please note that Cygwin's patched libtool contains a modification to
> postinstall
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> The attached patch to FSF CVS libtool is intended to make libtool
> (mostly) behave as it does for Cygwin when executed with MinGW. It
> consists of contributions from Elizabeth Barham, and my own efforts.
>
> The DLLs are installed to $(libdir)/../bin as they currently a
The attached patch to FSF CVS libtool is intended to make libtool
(mostly) behave as it does for Cygwin when executed with MinGW. It
consists of contributions from Elizabeth Barham, and my own efforts.
The DLLs are installed to $(libdir)/../bin as they currently are under
Cygwin. Any change to t
14 matches
Mail list logo
