All right, I'll try doing that. Thank you.
- Original Message
From: Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: libtool@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2008 3:32:27 PM
Subject: Re: Libtool versioning for the Git repository
Jeremiah Wilson yahoo.com> writes:
[your formattin
- Forwarded Message
From: Jeremiah Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2008 5:19:50 PM
Subject: Re: Libtool versioning for the Git repository
Sure!
This is the output from my most recent gnash checkout, r
Jeremiah Wilson yahoo.com> writes:
[your formatting is messed up in this reply, because you didn't send plain text]
>
>
> I think that instead of having the more recent version at the end of the
version string, it should be in front of the parentheses.So, instead of:
> libtool (GNU libtool 1.
Hi Jeremiah,
thanks for the report. I was not aware of this.
* Jeremiah Wilson wrote on Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 08:49:47PM CEST:
> I think that instead of having the more recent version at the end of
> the version string, it should be in front of the parentheses.
>
> So, instead of: libtool (GNU l
I think that instead of having the more recent version at the end of the
version string, it should be in front of the parentheses.
So, instead of: libtool (GNU libtool 1.3016 2008-10-05) 2.2.7a
I propose: libtool 2.2.7a (GNU libtool 1.3016 2008-10-05)
The reason for this is that certain program
