Re: Intel icc and shared libs

2002-09-21 Thread Carl D. Roth
> Curious, what kind of "System", i.e. POSIX/Bourne shell, are you using > to accomplish your native use? I'm assuming here that icc is a Win32 > compiler, sorry if I'm wrong. I ask because I have a product that can > be configured for your use as a native icc host/build system. > > Earnie. >

Re: Intel icc and shared libs

2002-09-21 Thread Earnie Boyd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > ==> "bw" == Bill Wendling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > bw> # How to pass a linker flag through the compiler. wl="" > > bw> to: > > bw> # How to pass a linker flag through the compiler. wl="-Wl," > > bw> That might help things... > > On the ve

Re: Intel icc and shared libs

2002-09-21 Thread mlist . gnu . libtool
==> "bw" == Bill Wendling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: bw> # How to pass a linker flag through the compiler. wl="" bw> to: bw> # How to pass a linker flag through the compiler. wl="-Wl," bw> That might help things... On the version of icc that I use, it's more like wl="-Qo

Re: Intel icc and shared libs

2002-09-20 Thread Bill Wendling
Also sprach Philip Willoughby: } I'm having difficulty persuading libtool (version 1.4.2) to build shared } libraries using icc. Is this possible (I'm guessing not with 1.4.2)? } Assuming no, is it fixed in a newer version of libtool, or in current CVS, } or do I need an extra patch? } I find th

Intel icc and shared libs

2002-09-18 Thread Philip Willoughby
I'm having difficulty persuading libtool (version 1.4.2) to build shared libraries using icc. Is this possible (I'm guessing not with 1.4.2)? Assuming no, is it fixed in a newer version of libtool, or in current CVS, or do I need an extra patch? Please cc me in replies since I'm not on this list