Re: GNU Libtool 2.2.7b released (2.2.8 release candidate).

2010-05-24 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Alon Bar-Lev wrote on Sat, May 22, 2010 at 11:13:50AM CEST: >> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> > * Alon Bar-Lev wrote on Sat, May 22, 2010 at 09:44:46AM CEST: >> >> If I read your response correctly, all is ne

Re: GNU Libtool 2.2.7b released (2.2.8 release candidate).

2010-05-24 Thread Roumen Petrov
Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Hi Roumen, On 22 May 2010, at 03:26, Roumen Petrov wrote: Gary V. Vaughan wrote: The Libtool Team is pleased to announce release candidate 2.2.7b of GNU Libtool. If there are no serious deficiencies reported in this release, it will be renumbered as 2.2.8 and re-releas

Re: GNU Libtool 2.2.7b released (2.2.8 release candidate).

2010-05-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Alon Bar-Lev wrote on Sat, May 22, 2010 at 11:13:50AM CEST: > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Alon Bar-Lev wrote on Sat, May 22, 2010 at 09:44:46AM CEST: > >> If I read your response correctly, all is needed is to set: > >> lt_cv_deplibs_check_method="pass_all" > >>

Re: GNU Libtool 2.2.7b released (2.2.8 release candidate).

2010-05-22 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sat, 22 May 2010, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Is the problem due to Windows searching for DLLs along $PATH? And, if so, do you know whether the current directory is always searched first irrespective of the PATH setting? Yes, Windows uses PATH equivalently to LD_LIBRARY_PATH except that it doe

Re: GNU Libtool 2.2.7b released (2.2.8 release candidate).

2010-05-22 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Adam Mercer wrote on Fri, May 21, 2010 at 07:23:38PM CEST: > Just updated one of my projects to use libtool-2.2.7b and configure > now fails with: > > configure: error: conditional "am__fastdepCXX" was never defined. > Usually this means the macro was only invoked conditionally. > > in configur

Re: GNU Libtool 2.2.7b released (2.2.8 release candidate).

2010-05-22 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > GNU Libtool hides the complexity of using shared libraries behind a > consistent, portable interface. GNU Libtool ships with GNU libltdl, > which hides the complexity of loading dynamic runtime libraries > (modules) behind a consistent, por

Re: GNU Libtool 2.2.7b released (2.2.8 release candidate).

2010-05-22 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello, > > please don't Cc: autotools-announce on discussions.  Thanks. Sorry. > * Alon Bar-Lev wrote on Sat, May 22, 2010 at 09:44:46AM CEST: >> If I read your response correctly, all is needed is to set: >> lt_cv_deplibs_check_method="

Re: GNU Libtool 2.2.7b released (2.2.8 release candidate).

2010-05-22 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello, please don't Cc: autotools-announce on discussions. Thanks. * Alon Bar-Lev wrote on Sat, May 22, 2010 at 09:44:46AM CEST: > If I read your response correctly, all is needed is to set: > lt_cv_deplibs_check_method="pass_all" > For mingw hosts. > > But I am no expert in libtool, and it is

Re: GNU Libtool 2.2.7b released (2.2.8 release candidate).

2010-05-22 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > Hi Alon, > > On 22 May 2010, at 13:02, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: >> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >>> >>> GNU Libtool hides the complexity of using shared libraries behind a >>> consistent, portable interface. GNU Libto

Re: GNU Libtool 2.2.7b released (2.2.8 release candidate).

2010-05-21 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Alon, On 22 May 2010, at 13:02, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >> >> GNU Libtool hides the complexity of using shared libraries behind a >> consistent, portable interface. GNU Libtool ships with GNU libltdl, >> which hides the complexity of loadi

Re: GNU Libtool 2.2.7b released (2.2.8 release candidate).

2010-05-21 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > > GNU Libtool hides the complexity of using shared libraries behind a > consistent, portable interface. GNU Libtool ships with GNU libltdl, > which hides the complexity of loading dynamic runtime libraries > (modules) behind a consistent, p

Re: GNU Libtool 2.2.7b released (2.2.8 release candidate).

2010-05-21 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Roumen, On 22 May 2010, at 03:26, Roumen Petrov wrote: > Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >> >> The Libtool Team is pleased to announce release candidate 2.2.7b of GNU >> Libtool. If there are no serious deficiencies reported in this release, >> it will be renumbered as 2.2.8 and re-released (otherwise

Re: GNU Libtool 2.2.7b released (2.2.8 release candidate).

2010-05-21 Thread Roumen Petrov
Gary V. Vaughan wrote: GNU Libtool hides the complexity of using shared libraries behind a consistent, portable interface. GNU Libtool ships with GNU libltdl, which hides the complexity of loading dynamic runtime libraries (modules) behind a consistent, portable interface. The Libtool Team is pl

Re: GNU Libtool 2.2.7b released (2.2.8 release candidate).

2010-05-21 Thread Adam Mercer
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 14:01, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Gary > In the end AC_PROG_CXX is not very time consuming, so I'd recommend > something more along the lines of (untested - from memory): > > AC_PROG_CXX > AM_CONDITIONAL([BUILD_BOINC], [test "x${boinc}" = xtrue]) > > and then in Makefile.am >

Re: GNU Libtool 2.2.7b released (2.2.8 release candidate).

2010-05-21 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Adam, On 22 May 2010, at 00:23, Adam Mercer wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 19:22, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >> The Libtool Team is pleased to announce release candidate 2.2.7b of GNU >> Libtool. If there are no serious deficiencies reported in this release, >> it will be renumbered as 2.2.8 an

Re: GNU Libtool 2.2.7b released (2.2.8 release candidate).

2010-05-21 Thread Adam Mercer
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 19:22, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Hi > The Libtool Team is pleased to announce release candidate 2.2.7b of GNU > Libtool.  If there are no serious deficiencies reported in this release, > it will be renumbered as 2.2.8 and re-released (otherwise, we'll fix > any problems and

Re: GNU Libtool 2.2.7b released (2.2.8 release candidate).

2010-05-20 Thread Vincent Torri
Hey, On Fri, 21 May 2010, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: GNU Libtool hides the complexity of using shared libraries behind a consistent, portable interface. GNU Libtool ships with GNU libltdl, which hides the complexity of loading dynamic runtime libraries (modules) behind a consistent, portable inter

GNU Libtool 2.2.7b released (2.2.8 release candidate).

2010-05-20 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
GNU Libtool hides the complexity of using shared libraries behind a consistent, portable interface. GNU Libtool ships with GNU libltdl, which hides the complexity of loading dynamic runtime libraries (modules) behind a consistent, portable interface. The Libtool Team is pleased to announce release