On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 1:05 AM, David Turner wrote:
> For the record, I've kept the $release to keep the structure similar to the
> glibc one. I admit I don't really know what that corresponds to, but I could
> successfully build working shared libraries for a few projects with my
> patch. Good e
Hello,
Glad seeing this being addressed :-)
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Brooks Moses wrote:
> Hello, Marco,
>
> Thanks for pinging this -- I'm trying to work through some of the libtool
> patch backlog, and I'll have a look at this in the next few days.
>
> I note that David Turner also p
Hello, Marco,
Thanks for pinging this -- I'm trying to work through some of the
libtool patch backlog, and I'll have a look at this in the next few days.
I note that David Turner also posted a patch for Android support in
libtool more recently:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patch
Hi Brooks,
nice to hear back from you guys.
Well, David used to answer my questions re the ndk when I had no idea
how to go further, he develops the toolchain so I guess there must be an
advantage in his approach :)
mine was just a way I managed to deal with the problem I encoutred back
in 20
I try again, lets see if this patch can be applied.
ciao
Marco
Original Message
Subject: Fwd: android support
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 16:48:51 +0200
From: Marco Bernasocchi
Organization: bernawebdesign.ch
To: libtool-patc...@gnu.org
Hi guys, I never heard back, did this make i
