On Tuesday 17 April 2001 4:14 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Actually... Robert Boehne has already merged my changes
> into the multi-language-branch.
Okay, great. I'll evaluate your patch tonight (GMT).
Cheers,
Gary.
> Dan
>
> > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 16 20:49:52 2001
> >
> >
On Tuesday 17 April 2001 4:25 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 16 20:49:52 2001
> >
> > > - When building libtool without run-time-linking, my changes do still
> > > create a lib.a. However, it is an actual archive containing the
> > > shared object (just like the
> From: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Piggybacking off of Gary's response
>
> > On Monday 16 April 2001 11:05 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> - When building libtool without run-time-linking, my changes do still
> >> create a lib.a. However, it is an actual archive containing t
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 16 20:49:52 2001
>
> > - When building libtool without run-time-linking, my changes do still
> > create a lib.a. However, it is an actual archive containing the
> > shared object (just like the quirky way the rest of AIX does it).
> > What you end up with is a l
Actually... Robert Boehne has already merged my changes
into the multi-language-branch.
Dan
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 16 20:49:52 2001
> >
> > Do you think there is any chance of getting my AIX changes in?
>
> Certainly. Sooner, if you help me with a port to the multi-language-branch..
On Apr 16, 2001, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some vague memory also tells me that this is how shared library versioning
> is done (with differently named shared objects).
Yep, this matches my understanding of the way shared libraries work on
AIX.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guaran
Gary V Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Dan,
> Don't forget to at least Cc: one of the lists... I might be struck by
> lightning before I get chance to reply ;-)
Piggybacking off of Gary's response
> On Monday 16 April 2001 11:05 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> - When building lib
changes in?
Certainly. Sooner, if you help me with a port to the multi-language-branch...
I won't try to evaluate and port it now, my brain functions better before 3am
=)O|
> Dan McNichol
Cheers,
Gary.
> > From: "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&g
Hi Dan,
On Thursday 12 April 2001 5:42 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just sucked down a fresh copy of the HEAD branch from cvs.
>
> libtool/ltdl.m4 contains the following line:
> AC_CHECK_FUNCS(memcpy bcopy, break)
Uh-huh.
> But there is nothing in libtool/configure.in nor
> libtool/libltdl
ary.
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Configuring libtool HEAD branch.
> >
> > I just sucked down a fresh copy of the HEAD branch from cvs.
> >
> > libtool/ltdl.m4 contains the following line:
> >
bject: Re: Configuring libtool HEAD branch.
>
> I just sucked down a fresh copy of the HEAD branch from cvs.
>
> libtool/ltdl.m4 contains the following line:
> AC_CHECK_FUNCS(memcpy bcopy, break)
>
> But there is nothing in libtool/configure.in nor libtool/libltdl/configure.in.
I just sucked down a fresh copy of the HEAD branch from cvs.
libtool/ltdl.m4 contains the following line:
AC_CHECK_FUNCS(memcpy bcopy, break)
But there is nothing in libtool/configure.in nor libtool/libltdl/configure.in.
Dan
> From: "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Wednesday 11 Ap
On Wednesday 11 April 2001 11:03 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am running into a small problem when using our native
> compiler because HAVE_MEMCPY is not being set (or even
> checked for).
Do you have AC_CHECK_FUNCS(memcpy) in your configure.in?
Cheers,
Gary.
--
___ _
Dan:
Libtool HEAD and MLB should work with autoconf-2.13,
as well as CVS versions. I haven't tested CVS versions
with HEAD, but I'd be suprised if they didn't work.
I doubt that autoconf is the problem, so why don't you post
some more details and a description of how to repeat
the problem.
Ro
Does anyone know if there is a minimum version of
autoconf that needs to be used to build the latest
code from the HEAD branch?
I am running into a small problem when using our native
compiler because HAVE_MEMCPY is not being set (or even
checked for).
Could something other than autoconf be my p
15 matches
Mail list logo