Re: Building a Libtool 2 package with libltdl from 1.5

2008-12-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > The question now is: will people be able to build tarballs that come > with Libtool 2.2 with from Libtool 1.5? The answer is actually "no", precisely because of this additional line in (missing from 1.5) [*]: #define lt_preloaded_symbols

Re: Building a Libtool 2 package with libltdl from 1.5

2008-11-26 Thread Rafał Mużyło
Something that may be of interest: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212723 especially my comment #8. For non-Gentoo users: eautoreconf (if I were to simplify it) is something like this: - first call aclocal (with additional -I options, if needed) - then check for libtool use and call 'libto

Re: Building a Libtool 2 package with libltdl from 1.5

2008-11-26 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Ludovic Courtès wrote on Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 09:38:53AM CET: >> The Guile project is considering moving from Libtool 1.5 to 2.2. We >> noticed subtle incompatibilities when people tried to compile Guile >> tarballs (which use Libtool 1.5 up

Re: Building a Libtool 2 package with libltdl from 1.5

2008-11-25 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Ludovic, * Ludovic Courtès wrote on Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 09:38:53AM CET: > The Guile project is considering moving from Libtool 1.5 to 2.2. We > noticed subtle incompatibilities when people tried to compile Guile > tarballs (which use Libtool 1.5 up to now) with from Libtool > 2.2 [0]. >

Re: Building a Libtool 2 package with libltdl from 1.5

2008-11-25 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Ludovic Courtès wrote: I don't think there was ever any intention for libtool 2.2.X to work with libltdl from libtool 1.5.X. If libltdl is not bundled with the package, then it should be possible to use an already installed libltdl from libtool 1.5.X. What do you mean exac

Re: Building a Libtool 2 package with libltdl from 1.5

2008-11-25 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> >> The question now is: will people be able to build tarballs that come >> with Libtool 2.2 with from Libtool 1.5? > > I don't think there was ever any intention for libtool 2.2.X to work > with libl

Re: Building a Libtool 2 package with libltdl from 1.5

2008-11-25 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Ludovic Courtès wrote: The question now is: will people be able to build tarballs that come with Libtool 2.2 with from Libtool 1.5? I don't think there was ever any intention for libtool 2.2.X to work with libltdl from libtool 1.5.X. If libltdl is not bundled with the

Building a Libtool 2 package with libltdl from 1.5

2008-11-25 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, The Guile project is considering moving from Libtool 1.5 to 2.2. We noticed subtle incompatibilities when people tried to compile Guile tarballs (which use Libtool 1.5 up to now) with from Libtool 2.2 [0]. The question now is: will people be able to build tarballs that come with Libtool