On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 15:13 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Keith, others,
>
> Sorry for the response latency. This is a status update for the -sobase
> patch: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2005-07/msg00093.html.
Thanks for your response and your work on this matter.
> Your patch
Hi Keith, others,
Sorry for the response latency. This is a status update for the -sobase
patch: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2005-07/msg00093.html.
* Keith Packard wrote on Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 09:55:47PM CEST:
> On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 13:58 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> > Re-r
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 13:58 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Re-reading this thread, I would be inclined to accept a patch which
> implements your original proposal, given that a way can be found how it
> degrades gracefully on the different/not-so-flexible shared library
> systems mentioned. That
Hi Keith,
* Keith Packard wrote on Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 11:42:57PM CEST:
> On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 11:23 +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
>
> > Now I'm wondering whether it would make sense to add a switch to libtool
> > that makes it not install those two things, such as "-old-abi".
>
> I have to supp
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 11:23 +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> Now I'm wondering whether it would make sense to add a switch to libtool
> that makes it not install those two things, such as "-old-abi".
I have to support two of these library versions as 'current' for other
reasons, so applications need
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 16:15 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Keith, could you confirm that this would be enough for your needs, when
> given as install mode switch? Current idea would be to have it install
> the first name from library_names only, do not delete the symlinks nor
> create new ones,
libraries not in ld.so.cache; I'll have to make sure I create the links
at install time. Of course, if we do hack libtool to support alternate
SONAME values, we could also hack it to manage these symlinks for us.
-keith
signature.asc
Description:
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 14:10 +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
> > "Keith" == Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > No, I haven't. I have little experience with these systems, so I don't
> > even know if this scheme will work. Hence my question to this list where
> > I imagine there are
* Simon Richter wrote on Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 11:23:51AM CEST:
> Keith Packard wrote:
>
> > I want the SONAME to be libXaw.so.6, but the filename to be libXaw6.la,
> > libXaw6.so.6.0.1, libXaw6.so.6 and libXaw6.so
>
> There is no need to name the real file libXaw6.so.6.0.1, as the 6 is
> mentione
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 04:15:53PM CEST:
> Keith, could you confirm that this would be enough for your needs, when
> given as install mode switch? Current idea would be to have it install
> the first name from library_names only, do not delete the symlinks nor
s/the first
Hi Keith,
* Keith Packard wrote on Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 08:47:37AM CEST:
> On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 08:31 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> > First, to stay with your GNU/Linux example, unless you also have
> > libXaw.so.6 as symlink, how will ld.so find your library (as installed
> > library; or al
Hi,
Keith Packard wrote:
> I want the SONAME to be libXaw.so.6, but the filename to be libXaw6.la,
> libXaw6.so.6.0.1, libXaw6.so.6 and libXaw6.so
There is no need to name the real file libXaw6.so.6.0.1, as the 6 is
mentioned twice this way (libXaw.so.6.0.1 suffices). The unversioned
symlink and
> "Keith" == Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, I haven't. I have little experience with these systems, so I don't
> even know if this scheme will work. Hence my question to this list where
> I imagine there are people with experience on those systems. The key
> question is whethe
> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ganesan Rajagopal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I didn't know this. But trying to make -version-info get the SONAME you
>> need is an abuse of libtool in any case. I think -version-number option
>> available in recent versions of libtool
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 08:31 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> First, to stay with your GNU/Linux example, unless you also have
> libXaw.so.6 as symlink, how will ld.so find your library (as installed
> library; or alternatively as user-installed test version below $HOME)?
The current ELF shared lib
> "Keith" == Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 09:24 +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
>> But libXaw.so. is the default behaviour for libtool. Are you
>> using -release instead of -version-info or -version-number? I think
>> -version-number will give you exactly
Hi Keith,
* Keith Packard wrote on Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 06:59:10AM CEST:
> On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 09:24 +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
>
> > But libXaw.so. is the default behaviour for libtool. Are you
> > using -release instead of -version-info or -version-number? I think
> > -version-number wi
Ganesan Rajagopal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I didn't know this. But trying to make -version-info get the SONAME you
> need is an abuse of libtool in any case. I think -version-number option
> available in recent versions of libtool is perfect for this.
When introducing libtool with a librarie
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 09:24 +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
> But libXaw.so. is the default behaviour for libtool. Are you
> using -release instead of -version-info or -version-number? I think
> -version-number will give you exactly what you need.
I want the SONAME to be libXaw.so.6, but the fil
> "Albert" == Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 03:53:17PM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
>> > "Keith" == Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > There is another way to solve the problem; we can change the SONAME in
>> > the versioned filename v
> "Keith" == Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 15:53 +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
>> > "Keith" == Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > There is another way to solve the problem; we can change the SONAME in
>> > the versioned filename varient
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 15:53 +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
> > "Keith" == Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > There is another way to solve the problem; we can change the SONAME in
> > the versioned filename varients:
>
> > Version 6 Xaw -> libXaw6.so.6.0.1 SONAME=libXaw.so
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 03:53:17PM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
> > "Keith" == Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > There is another way to solve the problem; we can change the SONAME in
> > the versioned filename varients:
>
> > Version 6 Xaw -> libXaw6.so.6.0.1 SONAME=li
> "Keith" == Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is another way to solve the problem; we can change the SONAME in
> the versioned filename varients:
> Version 6 Xaw -> libXaw6.so.6.0.1 SONAME=libXaw.so.6
> Version 7 Xaw -> libXaw7.so.7.0.0 SONAME=libXaw.so.7
> Version 8 Xaw -> l
I'm building a weird set of libraries and would like libtool to help out
a bit by providing some mechanism to modify the SONAME placed into
the .so file.
X has three versions of the Xaw library; version 6, 7 and 8
(cooresponding to the .so major version numbers, which are the same
across all suppo
25 matches
Mail list logo
