On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 11:30:22PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > So the 1.2 is "static"? Have you looked at -release? I don't know what
> > this will do to the SONAME though. It won't give you the name above
> > but close enough (libGL-1.2.xxyyzz.so).
>
>> "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Another digression; I'd like to know what you meant with the "mostly non
> issue" comment.
I forgot there's still a "Professional Edition" of Coin, and that even
LGPL Coin is anything but dead. My mistake.
WRT ABI compatibility, it should be
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 11:30:22PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
: needs a way to be able to set the soname. Yes, this is bad in general.
: It defeats the whole purpose of libtool, but the problem is that Mesa
: is providing another version of an existing library. I can imagine
: things
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> So the 1.2 is "static"? Have you looked at -release? I don't know what
> this will do to the SONAME though. It won't give you the name above
> but close enough (libGL-1.2.xxyyzz.so).
This is the problem. In this case the soname *must* be libGL.so.1 (on
Linux)
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 11:50:44AM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> I'm not going to put a lot of effort into explaining this but here's
> the story.
>
> Mesa's used the convention libGL.so.1.2.xxyyzz for some years now.
> The "1.2" indicates the library implements the OpenGL 1.2 API.
> Anything else t
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 11:50:44AM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
: I'm not going to put a lot of effort into explaining this but here's
: the story.
:
: Mesa's used the convention libGL.so.1.2.xxyyzz for some years now.
: The "1.2" indicates the library implements the OpenGL 1.2 API.
: Anything else t
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Sven M. Hallberg writes:
>
> > We use the formula
> > version-info = Major+minor:Mesa_version:Minor
> > to compute proper libtool version-info from the OpenGL version number (1.2)
> > and our current Mesa release number (MM.Mm.Mt, e.g. 3.5.0). So, Mesa_version
> > is
Sven M. Hallberg writes:
> We use the formula
> version-info = Major+minor:Mesa_version:Minor
> to compute proper libtool version-info from the OpenGL version number (1.2)
> and our current Mesa release number (MM.Mm.Mt, e.g. 3.5.0). So, Mesa_version
> is an integer derived from that release num
Hi,
I'm working on the Mesa project's build system using autoconf, automake, and
libtool. We're running into the following problem:
We use the formula
version-info = Major+minor:Mesa_version:Minor
to compute proper libtool version-info from the OpenGL version number (1.2)
and our current Mesa r
