Re: "libtool" performance...

2008-04-14 Thread Roland Mainz
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Roland Mainz wrote on Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 04:59:15PM CEST: > > Ok... but "dolt" may been to be adopted to other compilers (like Sun > > Workshop/Forte/Studio, icc etc.) and then it will be a bit more than the > > 10 lines (and adopting it

Re: "libtool" performance... / was: Re: Announcing Dolt, a drop-inLibtool replacement which cuts build timesin half

2008-04-11 Thread Roland Mainz
Roland Mainz wrote: > Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 04:23:52PM +0200, Roland Mainz wrote: > > > Uhm... a while ago we hit the same problem and did some research on the > > > issue and a diffent route by switching the shell used by libtool from >

Re: "libtool" performance... / was: Re: Announcing Dolt, a drop-inLibtool replacement which cuts build timesin half

2008-04-11 Thread Roland Mainz
Daniel Stone wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 04:23:52PM +0200, Roland Mainz wrote: > > Uhm... a while ago we hit the same problem and did some research on the > > issue and a diffent route by switching the shell used by libtool from > > "bash" to "ksh93&qu

"libtool" performance... / was: Re: Announcing Dolt, a drop-in Libtool replacement which cuts build timesin half

2008-04-11 Thread Roland Mainz
Josh Triplett wrote: [repost - somehow the first posting was rejected by some mailman lists... ;-( ] > Many packages use GNU autotools (automake and autoconf) to build, to > the point that "./configure && make" represents one of the most common > build procedures for Free Software packages. Librar

"libtool" performance... / was: Re: Announcing Dolt, a drop-in Libtool replacement which cuts build timesin half

2008-04-11 Thread Roland Mainz
Josh Triplett wrote: > > Many packages use GNU autotools (automake and autoconf) to build, to > the point that "./configure && make" represents one of the most common > build procedures for Free Software packages. Libraries using > autotools typically use GNU Libtool, partly because it works on a